Judiciary gets draft gender equality protocol

Barbados has taken a major step towards ensuring gender equality in the judicial system, through the development of a draft gender equality protocol for magistrates and judges.

The document, the first of its kind within the Caribbean Community, will support the judiciary in using gender analysis to ensure that both women and men have equal access to justice.

It was handed over Wednesday to United Nations (UN) officials and members of the judiciary, including Justice Adrian Saunders of the Caribbean Court of Justice and Chief Justice Sir Marston Gibson, by the drafters, UN Women, the Judicial Reform and Institutional Strengthening (JURIST) and the Caribbean Association of Judicial Officers (CAJO).

JURIST Regional Coordinator John Furlonge told the ceremony at UN House at Marine Gardens, Hastings, Christ Church that gender equality was one of four judicial reform initiatives being undertaken by the agency.

From left, JURIST Coordinator John Furlonge, Justice Adrian Saunders, Chief Justice Sir Marston Gibson, Canadian High Commissioner Marie Legault and UN Women Head of Office Tonni Brodber-Hem.

“These draft gender equality protocols will now be reviewed, circulated and ultimately finalized by, or before, the end of September 2017. This is the undertaking of the local implementation committee that has been established in Barbados, and works closely with the JURIST project,” Furlonge said.

Meantime, Sir Marston sought to give assurances that under the protocols, both men and women would receive equal access to justice.

“Gender equality should not lead us in the direction of favouring any one particular gender. Gender equality means that we must be impartial and we must look at the evidence, but we must be sensitive to the idea that what we do as judges will influence either gender equality or gender inequality if we’re not sensitive,” Sir Marston said.

Justice Saunders welcomed the document, noting that gender stereotypes contributed to “one of the most insidious forms of partiality” within the justice system.

“If gender stereotypes are unconsciously held, if they are not the product of a deliberate intention to discriminate, how can we as judges avoid falling prey to them? This is where the establishment of this protocol is so important.

“The protocol provides an easy reference point for judges and magistrates to be guided on the standards and approaches that are expected of us when we deal with issues that are gender sensitive. One of the goals of the protocol is to train the judicial mind in ways that promote impartial adjudication in the sphere of gender and gender relations,” Saunders said.

Source: (MCW)

5 Responses to Judiciary gets draft gender equality protocol

  1. Tony Webster April 14, 2017 at 2:39 pm

    I have always carried the conviction,the assuredness, that the (our) judiciary has always been impartial. Being impartial, by definition, and hopefully also in the application and the routine dispensing of Justice, would necessarily include the avoidance of partiality…whether this cursed bent bone, be aligned to rank, race, colour, occupation, perpetual postponements of cases, station in life…or gender. Where, therefore, exactly have I got it wrong…all along? Or put another way, whither Justice? I have before me, a very clear image of the Lady Justicia, eyes quite deliberately covered that she may dispense with absolute, uncoloured, and unbiased neutrality and equity, and holding the scales to balance and fairly judge weigh our actions. N’est pas?

    I also heard our C.J. assert that in coming to a decision, those on the bench must be ” gender sensitive” . Pray tell, Lord, whether this is not diametrically opposed to “neutrality”… the precise reason why Justicia…is blindfolded?

    Cumfa, Lord, cumfa, and judge us all.

    • Jennifer April 14, 2017 at 2:58 pm

      @Tony Webster – You took some of the words right out of my mouth. Maybe they were not impartial all along and thats the problem. And now needs this other set of parasites to help draft such a protocol. Hear we go with that head problem again.

  2. Tyrone Browne April 15, 2017 at 7:04 am

    I am baffled by the need for the protocol. as others have pointed out, there is no evidence of inequality in the local justice system. I smell a rat. Is the persecution of Christians, gender confusion and the legalization of same sex marriage hidden in the ‘equality’?

    • Jennifer April 15, 2017 at 2:39 pm

      @Tyrone – All of what you are saying will all go down and encompass Barbados too.

  3. Kammie Holder April 15, 2017 at 7:15 am

    A joke. Men are sent to prison daily for breach of maintainence orders while women who breach access orders don’t get a day. Some judicial officers boldly some blatant bias towards men and when challenge by the bold men among us, threaten with falsely threatens contempt. #GenderBias


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *