No-show MPs can be punished

The Public Accounts Committee is back in the news again. Before we get to the question of whether the persons summoned should or should not attend or what should happen to them if they don’t, we will do a refresher course.

The Committee is established by section 3 of the Public Accounts Committee Act, Chapter 10A and is comprised of six senators and seven members of the House of Assembly with the Chairman being the Leader of the Opposition.

Pursuant to section 5, the Committee must meet at minimum once every six months and five members of the Committee constitute a quorum. As with all things in our system of democracy, majority rules in relation to the Committee’s decisions with the Chairman having a deciding vote in the event of a tie.

Section 7 sets out the duties and responsibilities of the Committee. These include examining the audited financial statements of government bodies and statutory corporations and reports of the Auditor General, and reporting to the Senate and the House on any matters arising from such examination “which the Committee thinks should be drawn to the attention of Parliament.”

The Committee’s duties and responsibilities also include conducting inquiries into any matters relating to the public accounts which are referred to it by Parliament. Section 10 requires that the Committee take all evidence in public. Matters which are secret or confidential, since we are after all dealing with matters of state, may be heard in camera.

The evidence is taken on oath or affirmation and the Chairman of the Committee is a person authorised by section 10(3) to administer such oath or affirmation to the witnesses. Witnesses are summoned to appear similarly to how a court operates and the offence of perjury is also applicable in relation to evidence given before the Committee. The crime is punishable by a fine of $25,000.000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years.

There was previously an issue concerning a seeming conflict between the Act and the Standing Orders of Parliament. Section 50 of the Constitution provides that “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, each House may regulate its own procedure and for this purpose may make Standing Orders” which have in fact been put into place.

Standing Order 59 provides for a Committee of Public Accounts which shall consist of “not more than seven members” while section 3 of the Act provides for a Public Accounts Committee which is a joint committee of Parliament comprised of 13 members.

It still remains our opinion that the words of the Act are clear and that there is no question of the legitimacy of the Committee created by the Act. So, what is to be done about non-attendance by those summoned? Section 14 of the Act states that “Where a person upon whom a summons under section 11 has been served fails to appear or, having appeared, fails to continue in attendance in obedience to the summons, the Chairman or the Deputy Chairman shall report the matter to the House and the House may order the person to attend the Committee.”

Section 15 goes on to state that “A person upon whom a summons under section 11 has been served shall not, without reasonable excuse, proof whereof shall lie upon him, fail to appear or to continue in attendance in obedience to the summons.”

Section 21 outlines the penalty for such disobedience as being $25,000 or two years’ imprisonment or a combination of the two upon summary conviction (in a magistrate’s court).

So, we have Members of Parliament disobeying Parliament’s own laws which the rest of us are forced to obey and just a lot of noise in the newspaper. The real question is whether the Chairman or Deputy Chairman of the Committee has the “testicular fortitude” to make the requisite report and to ensure that the relevant criminal charges are laid.

(Alicia Archer is an attorney-at-law in private practice)

12 Responses to No-show MPs can be punished

  1. Krystle Howell
    Krystle Howell December 9, 2016 at 11:18 am

    Thank you so much for writing this article!

    Any idea who would be responsible for enforcing this?

    Hope the media makes them miserable highlighting this until they pay for their misconduct!

    Reply
  2. Rawle Spooner
    Rawle Spooner December 9, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Good article but squat gine happen because the person or persons who could do anything has zero testicular fortitude.

    Reply
  3. Sheryl Smith
    Sheryl Smith December 9, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    500 lines: I must not be disobedient.

    Reply
  4. Antoine Moore
    Antoine Moore December 9, 2016 at 2:31 pm

    Truth be told…they ain’t getting lock up and ain’t paying any fines. So good for wanna

    Reply
  5. Jai Callender
    Jai Callender December 9, 2016 at 2:51 pm

    They “Can” be but we all know that this would not happen

    Reply
  6. jrsmith December 9, 2016 at 4:48 pm

    Can be punished by whom , we dont have that kind of government in barbados, we have politicians who is about the law , do as they please accountability to no one , we have a priminister who is of the same tree …..,,..,.,,.,,,.,,..

    This is the reason why we have sewage in the streets, no transport buses running, no water in our taps , no money in the treasury ,30,000 vehicles uninsured on our roads in barbados , assistant of police running the force , drugs and guns all over the place and our young people behaving as like the politicians , disrespecting everyone…. Barbados have become as like the countries on the continental Africa…..

    Reply
  7. Annette Phillips-Gay
    Annette Phillips-Gay December 9, 2016 at 4:49 pm

    “Can be” but will they be?

    Reply
  8. Millicent Small
    Millicent Small December 9, 2016 at 7:03 pm

    Learn 10 commandments, repeat 3 times a day for 10 days…if you default repeat from start, in addition read Mathew, If you default, Mark, default Luke and John. Every morning start reading from psalms chapter I , then the Proverbs for good measure, throw in Revelations, defaulters much explain to the children at school what they did wrong what they understand from the guidance given to do the right thing from the beginning…if they get rude, arrogant lines and face in the corner…lol

    Reply
  9. Max Carter
    Max Carter December 9, 2016 at 7:15 pm

    This is barbados them can do what they feel like

    Reply
  10. harry turnover December 9, 2016 at 7:59 pm

    This Lawyer stating the LAW as though certain people in Barbados follow the Law.
    Not one RH gine happen.The mercy committee would release Peter Bradshaw again before certain people get lock up.

    Reply
  11. Michael Sheene December 9, 2016 at 9:22 pm

    I say time and time again. Theonly way that we will see any zemblence of good governance, law and order, accountability by politicians is to brkng back colonial rule with Westminister overseeing every move in and out of Parliament. We have too much respect and servility for the white man that we are bound to behave like we did prior to November ’66. Just watch the way that.white tourists and white Bajans are treated and compare wiith us blacks and you will get my drift.

    Reply
  12. Jack Ass December 18, 2016 at 3:12 pm

    Parliament cannot enforce it. only the magistrate court and furthermore they were verbally warned and not issued with summonses to appear.They were never given a chance to rebut the allegations by taking evidence from them. so it goes to show the law is very poor. they have no power to subpoena anybody. the laws of Bim is very and they support the criminal element of Barbados not the victims (the public or individual) so they are bound not to turn up.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *