Govt’s ‘tyrannical’ response to legal challenge disturbing – Thorne

Government has come in for a tongue-lashing from attorney-at-law Ralph Thorne, QC, for its failure to file a defence to the legal challenge to its plans to fingerprint Barbadians leaving and entering the country.

When the matter came up for hearing in the No 8 Supreme Court yesterday, Madam Justice Pamela Beckles ruled that the Immigration (Biometrics) Regulations 2015 were “null and void” and “not properly and lawfully enacted” in accordance with the provisions of Section 41 of the Interpretation Act, Chapter 1 of Laws of Barbados.

The case was heard in chambers after Government failed to file a defence within the required 28 days.

In an interview with Barbados TODAY, Thorne slammed the Freundel Stuart administration’s “tyrannical” approach to the legal challenge.

“Politically, there is a tyrannical content that is disturbing. The unkindest cut of all has been to flout the court’s authority in not even bothering to write its own defence as required by the rules of Court,” the attorney-at law charged.

“It portends badly for the constitutional mandate of peace, order and good government of Barbados,” he added.

Thorne, who will represent the Opposition Barbados Labour Party (BLP) in Christ Church South in the next election, welcomed yesterday’s court ruling.

“An independent judiciary has shown itself willing to defend the rule of law for the protection of the citizens against the potential for tyrannical rule,” he contended.

Another attorney-at-law long associated with the BLP, former Attorney General Sir Henry Forde, QC, gave yesterday’s ruling two thumbs up.

He told Barbados TODAY the verdict emphasized the importance of the rights of Barbadians to challenge the constitutionality of certain Government decisions.

“It is an interesting decision. Personally I agree with it. The constitution is a very important document [and] one needs to test these things against the constitutional provisions.

“You must bear in mind that the persons to be fingerprinted are Barbadians. The decision is made in the context of where Barbadians want to come and go to his or her country without restrictions based on the fact that the information may not be used for security reasons. It is interesting for both the Government and the people to follow these things as they go ahead,” Sir Henry said.

Attorney-at-law and social activist David Comissiong had brought a constitutional case against Prime Minister Freundel Stuart, whose office is responsible for immigration; Attorney General Adriel Brathwaite and Chief Immigration Officer Wayne Marshall, arguing the plan to fingerprint Barbadians was unconstitutional and restricted the right of citizens to return to their native country.

In her ruling Beckles said not only were the regulations unconstitutional, but that such an infringement was not reasonably required in the interest of the defence, public safety or public order of Barbados.

5 Responses to Govt’s ‘tyrannical’ response to legal challenge disturbing – Thorne

  1. Sheron Inniss July 2, 2016 at 5:54 am

    As I said from the beginning the government’s stance was wrong. Would I have taken them to court? No. I would have just waited until I was travelling and the personnel at immigration attempt to pull that stunt on me. Then I would have shown them which God them serving. I love to sue! ( Shout intentional )

  2. Carson C Cadogan July 2, 2016 at 9:00 am

    I would not expect anything else from Thorne. After all he is BLP.

    He is also misusing the Queen’s English.


    Please. Trying to be dramatic. The Barbados Labour Party is full of idiots.

  3. BaJan boy July 2, 2016 at 3:12 pm

    Carson C Cadogan Ralph Torne is brighter than all the men in the DLP put together and that includes you for sure. You should be the last to criticize the use of a word when your common grammar is horrific and embarrassing. You ought to be ashamed to call someone an idiot when you sit next to Adriel Brathwaite,Patrick Todd, Jepter Ince,Stephen Lashley,Harry Mapp and I can go on. Stop putting yuh foot in yuh mout like most of the others. The problem here is that Adriel Brathwaite who never went in a court prefers this decision then to go in court and embarras himself. We need and Attorney General as none can be worst than the drunkinig abusive clown….

  4. dave July 2, 2016 at 6:07 pm

    I would not expect anything else from Carson
    Afterall He/She is DLP

    Jokers always accusing others of being political when they are Yard ducks and Yard fowls of the highest order. We have not seen the other yardfowl on this forum for a few days eh Bajan boy . He gone SILENT !!! Bubble Burst !!!

  5. Mervin Kellman July 3, 2016 at 8:53 am

    This DLP administration is a national embarrassment. When will they get even the simplest thing right? Their list of failure continues to lengthen with every passing day.
    I am told that the Prime Minister is an Attorney at Law, I expect the Attorney General to be one also. Were they not aware that the regulations were in breach of the Constitution.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *