Maloney running things, says Mottley

Prominent developer Mark Maloney found himself in Opposition Leader Mia Mottley’s crosshairs as she led off debate in the House of Assembly on a no-confidence motion in the Freundel Stuart administration.

Mark Maloney
Mark Maloney

Mottley questioned whether a number of projects undertaken by the developer had been approved by the Town & Country Planning Development Office (TCPDO) before they were actually allowed to get off the ground.

She identified the entrance to the Villages at Coverley off the ABC Highway and the construction of the gas station in the development; Rock Hard Cement operations at the old Flour Mill site; the constructionof the Valery housing units in Brittons Hill; and the Bushy Park redevelopment.

In the case of the latter project in St Philip, Mottley raised questions about a fence and ticket booth being constructed on the old railway track and the construction of the first of five planned clusters of luxury car suites.

She also asked why the gas station in the Villages of Coverley was continuing operations, in defiance of TCPDO’s instructions for the removal of houses within 50 metres of the service station.

Earlier in the debate, the Opposition Leader also levelled claims that the National Cultural Foundation had leased the old Empire Theatre to the Maloney Group Inc., even though the TCPDO had refused its 2013 application for a theatre and craft brewery as a result of the company’s failure to submit an environmental scoping study. That, she said, was after the BEAT Foundation had obtained approval from the Office of the Prime Minister for the restoration of the theatre last year, following an application submitted in 2012.

“I have to ask myself, ‘who is running Barbados?’.

“How do we get into the business of creating another profit centre for the same group of individuals? How does this Government explain a lease given to the Maloney Group Inc.; Town Planning approval refused; and the poor BEAT Foundation can’t get a lease, a sub-lease, a piece of lease . . . but they have Town Planning permission because, I believe, their proposal finds favour with those sensitive to heritage development.”

Mottley also directed her attention to Hard Rock Cement, claiming that it had not received approval for construction at its current site.

“It is bad enough that they were the beneficiary of an opportunity to run a cement plant on valuable port lands. When was that put out to a request for proposal? When did the port either do, or require of them, an environmental impact assessment?” Mottley asked.

“All I want to know is when Town Planning will issue an enforcement notice.”

The Opposition Leader said that apart from the issues surrounding the plant itself, she had learned that officers at the neighbouring Coast Guard headquarters were being affected by its operations.

She claimed that the Chief of Staff of the Barbados Defence Force had written to Government indicating that there has been an unusual number of Coast Guard members developing upper respiratory tract infections.

6 Responses to Maloney running things, says Mottley

  1. Lisa Moore
    Lisa Moore May 11, 2016 at 6:04 am

    I marvel over these statements because when the Blp in power the same thing happens. Stupes do

  2. Rawle Spooner
    Rawle Spooner May 11, 2016 at 7:26 am

    Well whats new this is how Barbados really works both of these political parties give all the goodies to they rich friends and could care less about bottom of the rug everyday folks.Thats why ya can’t take these con artist politicians from either of these political parties seriously but she has a point about this person his name deem to be on everything that taxpayers paying for under this present government anyone remember Cahill and molasses tanks off Spring Garden Highway his name on those also.

  3. recoanthony May 11, 2016 at 9:10 am

    kick backs, back hands, draw backs..would love to see de ministers accounts hahahahahahaha boy oh boy

  4. Lesley Desborough May 11, 2016 at 10:09 am

    For once I reluctantly agree with Mia Mottley and her concern for the stranglehold Maloney seems to have over many of today’s projects, legally agreed or not. Could the lease on the Empire not be rescinded and handed to BEAT Foundation who have planning approval for a theatre, cinema and arts centre,much more in tune with the needs of central Bridgetown? This situation should have be resolved years ago and Maloney’s intrusion has simply delayed matters with nothing happening and the poor Empire disintegrating before our eyes. PLEASE WILL SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING? !!!!!!!!!!!

  5. David G. Brooks May 11, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    Sorry to say but Bajans will not do a thing … nuff talk and will be all.

    And when elections come along they will sell their votes for whatever is being given and then turn around a talk about the above and things like it like butter can’t melt in in their mouths.

    That is how fickle we are.

  6. Nathaniel Samuels May 11, 2016 at 10:55 pm

    It really is nauseating that one company can get so much and so many large contracts. Why can’t the contracts be shared out with a percentage being given to the small businesses as this government promised years ago. Their governance is a dereliction of duty and they should be given the walking papers. I only hope that when election time comes around the people of this country remember all the insensitive things these ministers said, all the promises they made and all the hardships they put us through and give them a failing grade by not giving them a vote. We have the power to make it happen and if the BLP acts as this group continues to do, then we can do the same thing too.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *