Don’t wait

Financial expert and economist warn govt to go to IMF now

Go to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) without any further delay or Barbados will have to take a much more bitter economic pill to recover from its troubles.

That message to the Freundel Stuart Administration came today from head of Jamaica’s Independent Oversight Committee for that country’s IMF programme, Rolston Hyman, who expressed fears that Barbados could end up like Jamaica with a tainted reputation in the multilateral lending community.

His advice coincided with a recommendation by president of the Barbados Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI), Tracey Shuffler, and chairperson of the BCCI’s trade and economic policy committee, Ryan Straughn, that the Government should enter a standby arrangement with the IMF, taking into consideration that its 19-month adjustment programme was well behind target.

Rolston Hyman
Rolston Hyman

“When you eventually go, the conditions are going to be more onerous,” warned Hyman who said his country had paid dearly for failing to approach the Fund sooner.

He was speaking this morning at the Hilton Barbados as he shared a panel with Straughn and economic advisor to the Opposition Leader, Dr Clyde Mascoll, at a BCCI discussion on the merits and demerits of a structured IMF programme.

Stating that Jamaica and the IMF have had a love-hate relationship for the past 39 years, Hyman recalled his country’s apprehension about going to the lending institution, even though it was running a current account deficit of 20 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fiscal deficit of 10.7 per cent of GDP and a total public sector debt of almost 13 per cent of GDP.

“We delayed in approaching the IMF. We took a standby agreement, like shock treatment; so you are ill, you take long to go to the doctor, then when you go, it’s emergency surgery,” he said.

“That agreement was so onerous that we could not successfully navigate the agreement . . . . It had a negative impact on Jamaica’s reputation in the multilateral community
. . . and when we went back it took us longer, because the multilateral community was reluctant to engage us.”

However, Hyman said Jamaica has been successful in getting a longer-term structural agreement.

“So it’s a matter of being pragmatic in order to re-engage, because the IMF is the lender of last resort. Nobody is going to lend you if you are in that kind of situation running those fiscal and debt ratios if you do not engage in a programme with the International Monetary Fund.”

Hyman said Barbados had to learn that being downgraded by international rating agencies and not having a formal arrangement with the IMF would make it difficult to attract capital and borrowing.

Speaking on behalf of the BCCI, Straughn also recommended that Government engage the Fund since “the adjustment programme is not working”.

Ryan Straughn
Ryan Straughn

“Yes, we have supposedly stabilized the reserves and, from a national point of view, that might be good to protect the [currency] peg. But, at the same time, we have increased the interest payments component of the expenditure problem that we already had,” asserted the former president of the Barbados Economics Society.

Straughn also expressed concern that the revenues from the current adjustment programme were underperforming and no real movement was being seen on the expenditure side.

“We need to have more clarity, see more urgent action and credible results . . . to be confident that the process will work. We could go and try to engage new investment and the truth is, so long as that problem remains, there will always be a credible threat to the exchange rate. We need to remove the perception of that threat. Nobody is going to bring new money into Barbados to invest if there is a perception that there is a potential balance of payment problem,” he cautioned.

While not saying whether Government should enter a structured agreement with the IMF, Mascoll said the only variable over which the Freundel Stuart Administration had any control was its debt.

He noted that it had increased by $5.3 billion during the last six years, compared to $3.5 billion between 1994 and 2008 and suggested that Government set targets for debt going forward and “control those targets”.

“But it cannot only be about controlling debt. There is a major fiscal crisis to resolve,” Mascoll added.

His solution for achieving growth in the economy is to switch from increasing current expenditure to introducing a capital works programme.

win a honda

ALSO If you sign up for Barbados Today before independence you could WIN a 2014 Honda City! Go here for full details

5 Responses to Don’t wait

  1. Veroniva Boyce
    Veroniva Boyce September 25, 2014 at 2:35 am

    Telling HeKnows to ask the IMF for help is like trying to get blood out of a stone. He stomach ain’t touching his back, he suits still fit him. HeKnows, the pop guts, skin teeth and pure talk wirh no substance crew don’t give a damn about the citizens that have to struggle every day to provide for their families.

  2. Steve Crawford
    Steve Crawford September 25, 2014 at 9:07 am

    Those who are pleading for the government to turn to the IMF, remember, you have the right to choose, but you have no control of the consequences. Going to the IMF is preparation and a prerequisite for the Military(Defense Force) to take over the government

  3. Charly Bamboo
    Charly Bamboo September 25, 2014 at 9:17 am

    Why would you go to those blood suckers? The IMF.

  4. Angel OfThunder
    Angel OfThunder September 25, 2014 at 10:54 am

    Remember David Estwick was telling them about that 5 billion no one remember that,sad to see this Nation only got a few real thinkers sad too see….

  5. Rickie Nurse September 26, 2014 at 11:41 am

    At this current juncture, Barbados is in between a Rock and a Hard Place based on the evidence shown by independent persons and financial bodies outside of the government.

    Having to go to the IMF, it’s not a relishing thought for many, but given the trend that the country is being forced to endure, in the face of all the other failed implementations and strategies, seeking relief form the IMF is our only option, and may be viewed as a necessary evil.

    The idea that this is a prerequisite for military intervention in my opinion is stretching it too far, there is nothing to show where other countries in our region having had military intervention, after undertaking IMF measures as a means of fiscal prudence to economic recovery.

    Jamaica and Guyana are the first two to quickly come to mind where the IMF intervened at the government’s request and there was never an attempted military takeover, so I see no grounds why it should be assumed that if undertaken here ( AGAIN ) that the outcome will be different.

    Barbados has been in IMF programs before and they were successfully negotiated, do the maths.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *