Productivity, not the state, protects jobs

Job loss under any circumstance is never an easy situation. And this remains true whether that final wage or salary comes from the private sector or the state coffers.

Often, productivity or the lack thereof, is only contemplated when rumours or whispers of pending cuts start to make the rounds. We would be less than honest if we attempted to suggest that public and private sector workers have had productivity and 100 per cent effort at the forefront of their daily endeavours.

The high instances of sick leave, in the public sector especially, absenteeism, elongated lunch breaks, and a host of other infelicities, speak to an employment environment in need of improvement. Many make a song and dance about entities such as the National Initiative for Service Excellence but its very existence says very little for the culture in which it exists.

Why should an entity be empowered to promote being NISE? One would have thought that with maintaining employment and earning a livelihood being inextricably linked to productivity, that employees would offer service excellence at all times as though their very lives depended on it. Something, we daresay, is very wrong if employees have to be encouraged to do the things that lead to client satisfaction and job retention.

But we acknowledge that job loss is a reality of life that sometimes reaches the doors of those who are diligent, hard workers, as well as those who should take out patents on sloth and indifference. We also acknowledge that some 20-year veterans in a job may have actually contributed four years to the job in real terms. That individual who is last-in might very well be the body and soul of the organization.

So what happens after job loss? What are the options? What is the best strategy to ensure that the inconvenience of being placed on the breadline is rectified with some degree of dispatch? We have seen examples where the initial shock of unemployment led some to wave their green papers in the media. We observed in some instances where those sent home sought comfort from the arms and ears of self-serving politicians who articulated their concerns but offered no employment solutions. Perhaps it might have been better to go after, or create, that employment opportunity immediately.

It is true that crying and complaining sometimes offer emotional relief. But beyond that, what? Within the context of recent lay-offs in the island, arguably the best piece of wisdom was recently enunciated by chief community development officer Sandra Greenidge.

“. . . You must not depend on the Government at all. If you do that, it means that you may be idle, you may waste time. It wouldn’t be because the Government didn’t come through, but because you can do more for yourself than Government can.

“You may lose out if you are depending totally on the Government. You may lose out on benefitting from that which you alone can do for yourself. You can do some things  for yourself that are more important, more valuable and more precious than what the Government can do and that is no joke . . . . One of these things is using your mind to be creative and innovative. Follow your intuition and believe in yourself . . . ,” she said.

Sadly, these qualities only manifest themselves in times of adversity when circumstances change attitudes, encourage improved work ethics and promote greater productivity.

Someday we might evolve to a stage where we realize that these qualities also may protect jobs.

One Response to Productivity, not the state, protects jobs

  1. Tony Webster May 31, 2014 at 7:19 am

    Madam Ed….I agree wid all you say. The Good Book cautions , for an abundance of good reasons, the importance of raising a child…the right way. The Folks at NISE, are well-intentioned, but I would risk to say that it is very hard to teach an old dog, new tricks.
    Unless, of course, the dog be very, very hungry. Adversity, ma’m, is a strict tutor. Or as Bajans are fond of saying, “If yuh cyan hear…yuh gine feel”.
    Of course, as we ruefully watch the departing horse bolting clear of its stable, we might resolve that it be much better, and more economical, and even of immensely greater national benefit, to train our youngsters at the outset of their lives; giving them the skills not just to survive, but giving them both these and the incentive, to thrive in the jungle ‘out there’.
    We are but a young country. We now need to recognise our mis-steps (we could write a book about these); we need to learn very quickly; and especially we must see to it that our leaders do not shirk their immense responsibilities to fashion a meaningful future for this country. A future BEYOND 2018.
    For starters, I suggest we immediately pass a (another!) law, that henceforth, the use of the word “free” will not be allowed to pass any politician’s lips, except with the prior permission of His Excellency our Governor General.

    It all starts in each and every home; each and every school. The hour is late, and swift and decisive action, is now non-negotiable. Will our real leaders now please stand-up; and speak-up. Speak loudly; speak clearly. The time for tom-foolery is long gone.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *