News Feed

December 8, 2016 - No easy exit from sugar, warns Sinckler Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler ... +++ December 8, 2016 - Communication is key, warns Collymore In the face ongoing water, sewage a ... +++ December 8, 2016 - It’s a disgrace! An impassioned chairperson of the B ... +++ December 8, 2016 - Former BTA worker had ‘300 sick days in one year’ The Employment Rights Tribunal hear ... +++ December 8, 2016 - Burke hits new heights Barbados top ranked surfer on the W ... +++ December 8, 2016 - Economic headwinds ahead, says Jordan Advisory Partner at Pricewaterhouse ... +++

Campus Trendz appeal

MAN CONVICTED OF KILLING SIX WOMEN CHALLENGES SENTENCES

courtOne of the two men convicted for the deaths of six young women who perished in a fire at the Campus Trendz clothing store six years ago is appealing his six concurrent life sentences.

On August 15, 2012, Madame Justice Elneth Kentish ruled that Renaldo Anderson Alleyne, of Prescod Bottom, Hindsbury Road, St Michael, would spend the rest of his life behind bars for the manslaughter of Pearl Cornelius, Shana Griffith, Kellisha Olliviere, Tiffany Harding, Nikita Belgrave and Kelly-Ann Welch who died on September 3, 2010, in a horrific fire at the Bridgetown store.

On June 1, 2011, Alleyne pleaded not guilty to murder but admitted to manslaughter. His co-accused, Jamar Bynoe, was found guilty of murder and sentenced to hang in July this year.

Renaldo Alleyne

Renaldo Alleyne

In the Supreme Court today, attorney-at-law Arthur Holder in association with Roy Hurley, submitted an appeal to the sentences imposed on Alleyne on three grounds: that the trial judge failed to follow established guidelines in arriving at a sentence of life imprisonment; that the sentences were excessive; and that the appellant was entitled to a discount for his guilty plea.

Holder also presented case law to the appeal judges, including the matter of Roland Jack Forster Hodgson.

The veteran attorney charged that while the judge in Alleyne’s trial may have observed two of the three criteria for imposing a life sentence, as identified in the Hodgson matter, she failed to utilize the other that speaks to “where it appears from the nature of the offences or from the defendant’s history, that he is of unstable character likely to commit such offences in the future.”

He argued that the criteria are “accumulative” and one could not be enforced without the other. As such, Holder said, the life sentences would be invalidated.

The attorney submitted that Alleyne should not have been sentenced to six terms of life imprisonment which are “indeterminate”, but rather given a “determinate” sentence which is a fixed number of years of incarceration, as well as a discount for his early plea.

Following Holder’s submission, the matter was adjourned until next Wednesday for the court to be provided with a copy of the psychological report on Alleyne, and for Principal Crown Counsel Anthony Blackman and Crown Counsel Krystal Delaney to reply.

6 Responses to Campus Trendz appeal

  1. sk November 10, 2016 at 8:13 am

    Holder you a attorney i like but he dont deserve one sentence for he to be like the resr n release early no spend life for all so he would never see the streets in bim again

    Reply
  2. Alex Alleyne November 10, 2016 at 8:13 am

    “The sentences were excessive”. What madness I hearing from two learned men. Setting fire to a building and killing those 6 young Ladies, WHAT WILL YOU CALL THAT , Mr Holder & Hurley????????.

    Reply
  3. vad50 November 10, 2016 at 8:16 am

    I trust that the appeal do not go through; did they consider their actions when they burned the building and took the lives of those six young women. He deserved to be hanged; not serve six life sentences at the tax payers expense. Is his lawyer considering the pain of the families; and the fear that those young women experienced before they died.

    Reply
  4. Gloria Gittens November 10, 2016 at 9:03 am

    These bandits actually have lawyers to represent them, this is total madness, what is this world coming to?

    Reply
  5. Whitehill November 10, 2016 at 1:50 pm

    It would’ve been nice reading what someone had to say on the
    merits of these two attorneys submission as apposed to this emotional outburst of rubbish.

    Reply
  6. Winslow Brome November 10, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    These men blatently took the lives of young women that were productively employed and paying taxes to the crown.If it was up to me they would be hung.Excessive what Stupeeeees!!!!!!!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *