News Feed

December 10, 2016 - Ministers refuse to act on ‘illegal’ summons Three Cabinet ministers who refused ... +++ December 10, 2016 - PSV rage Minibus owner Victor Mottley is not ... +++ December 10, 2016 - Barrack lawyers smiling all the way to the bank Lawyers involved in the Al Barrack ... +++ December 10, 2016 - Inniss wants coconut vendors to cleanup their act Government minister Donville Inniss ... +++ December 10, 2016 - No morals! Don’t mock God! This was the ster ... +++ December 10, 2016 - ‘Absolutely unkempt’ Government went to Parliament today ... +++

Teen faces indecency charge

courtA St George teen who was charged in connection with a video showing a male making sexual advances towards a minor, appeared in court Thursday and was granted bail.

Kwame Everton Dashawn Yearwood, 17, of Groves Tenantry, was not required to plead to the indictable offence when he made his first appearance before Magistrate Douglas Frederick.

Yearwood, who was arrested after the video made the rounds on social media, is charged with committing an act of serious indecency towards a child under the age of 16.

The incident allegedly occurred sometime between September 17 and 19 this year.

Yearwood was granted bail in the sum of $5 000, which he posted with one surety, and was ordered to return to the District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Court on January 23, 2017.

He was also ordered to stay away from the complainant and the Nursery Drive van stand.

In a separate matter, Wayne Dexter Peters was also granted $5 000 bail on a rape charge.

Peters, 35, of Beckwith Street, St Michael, is charged with having sexual intercourse with a female, sometime between August 19 and September 30, without her consent.

Peters will return to court on January 23 as well.

20 Responses to Teen faces indecency charge

  1. Rehcra Aicram Enelra
    Rehcra Aicram Enelra October 21, 2016 at 6:20 am

    Hmmmmm…smh

    Reply
  2. Stephanie F. Chase
    Stephanie F. Chase October 21, 2016 at 6:46 am

    Given that he is a under 18 and they may be his first offence it warrants this young man be placed under strict supervision. He qualified for bail and has been placed back into the same environment which molded his predatory instincts. What restrictions have been placed on his movements? Is he free to roam and prey on other people’s daughters? The one good thing about this situation is that parents are aware of one more sexual offender in the Barbadian society. We need a sex offenders registry.

    Reply
  3. Sharon Taylor
    Sharon Taylor October 21, 2016 at 7:33 am

    What he did might seem awful… But he’s only reflecting what he see the older men do!

    Reply
    • Michelle Griffith
      Michelle Griffith October 21, 2016 at 8:19 am

      He looks a bit slow to me,he needs some sort of intervention because if he continues along this course he will either end up in jail or someone will end up in jail for him.

      Reply
    • Sharon Taylor
      Sharon Taylor October 21, 2016 at 9:47 am

      He good fast…. Cause he was good persuasive…. I bet he watch d older zr men and thought he had it all down pat! What a shame… My heart cries for both of dem….

      Reply
    • Michelle Griffith
      Michelle Griffith October 21, 2016 at 10:08 am

      Yes he was very very persuasive,good thing the young lady was a bit strong I keep wondering how she allowed herself to be caught up in such a complicated situation,she needs some serious counseling.

      Reply
    • Sharon Taylor
      Sharon Taylor October 21, 2016 at 1:11 pm

      She’s at the age where girls want boys to like them…. She’s also naive and trusting…. Luckily for her… She had sense enough to keep refusing….

      Reply
      • harry turnover October 22, 2016 at 3:36 pm

        Yes Sharon and Michelle two very good comments coming from women.

        Reply
    • Maria Leclair Dasilva
      Maria Leclair Dasilva October 21, 2016 at 4:02 pm
      Reply
  4. Veroniva Boyce
    Veroniva Boyce October 21, 2016 at 10:38 am

    WARPED PERVERTED Predator! Should not be allowed to see daylight!

    Reply
    • Sharon Ellis
      Sharon Ellis October 21, 2016 at 12:12 pm

      Stupseeeeeeeee he is only 17.

      Reply
    • harry turnover October 22, 2016 at 3:50 pm

      You talking chupidness !!.you never did what the BOY was trying to get the girl to do ?
      ….and she WASN’T forced at gunpoint or with a knife.She left SPRINGER SCHOOL met the BOY in the van stand and went to QUEENS PARK TOGETHER to have some BOY/GIRL FUN.
      Dem is CHILDREN..dem in got na money and transportation for dem to rent a room for $50 or $60 for 3 hrs.
      Wha wrong wid you..you never had any girl days ?

      Reply
  5. Lynda Bonnett
    Lynda Bonnett October 21, 2016 at 11:26 am

    The children Need to take responsibility for their actions…fullstop!!!!!! Society,welfare and suffering parents have to deal with numerous teenage and unwanted pregnancy for these children who want to be foo…g bout without thinking of consequences

    Reply
  6. Lynda Bonnett
    Lynda Bonnett October 21, 2016 at 11:29 am

    What was she doing there?was she kidnapped and taken there?I commended her for not engaging in his folly

    Reply
  7. Celestine Duke
    Celestine Duke October 21, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    First I am alredy hearing excuses for the young man and some blame moving towards the young lady.He gets bail????/ You gget jail for a SPLIFF.

    Reply
  8. Maria Leclair Dasilva
    Maria Leclair Dasilva October 21, 2016 at 4:14 pm
    Reply
  9. Zeus October 21, 2016 at 6:34 pm

    The girl should have been charged also ..if not for the video she would not have reported anything she was there on her own free will I am not taking sides but she was seen kissing the boy so she knew what she was doing

    Reply
    • harry turnover October 22, 2016 at 3:30 pm

      …but Zeus she didn’t report ANYTHING .She ONLY came into the spot light BECAUSE of the video.Had it not been for that video it would have gone down as another BOY GIRL encounter at that location BETWEEN children THAT KNOW EACH OTHER.
      CHARGE the girl too for engaging in LEWD conduct IN PUBLIC

      Reply
  10. Jack de Ripper October 21, 2016 at 8:57 pm

    None of which as a minor you can consent too. Leave little girls alone

    Reply
    • harry turnover October 22, 2016 at 4:24 pm

      The BOY is ONLY 17…you want the BOY to go after a 22 year old woman ?
      when you was a BOY you din used to engage in rudeness wid lil girls as it was called then ?
      When I was a youngster,a girl said she was 16 but looked like 17…two years down the road I said happy 18th birthday…..and to my surprise she said she was only 16….and when asked why she did that ..her reply was…” if I did tell you I was 14 ,you din gine want to interfere (deal ) wid me ‘
      Yes I know the Law,but….what could I have done in a situation like that ?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *