News Feed

October 23, 2016 - Remembering David Thompson Today marks the sixth anniversary o ... +++ October 23, 2016 - Today’s weather The Barbados Meteorological office ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Lashley urges innovation Minister of Culture, Youth and Spor ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Christmas Wonderland is back After a 12-year break, Simpson Moto ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Husbands wins St James South nomination Sandra Husbands has been elected th ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Burst main near Springer Memorial A crew from the Barbados Water Aut ... +++

MISSOURI – Big payout for cancer death linked to baby powder

MISSOURI –– A jury in the American state of Missouri has ordered Johnson & Johnson (J&J) to pay $72 million to the family of a woman who claimed her death was linked to use of the company’s baby powder talc.

Jackie Fox from Birmingham, Alabama, died of ovarian cancer last year, aged 62, having used the talc for decades.


Her family argued that the firm knew of talc risks and failed to warn users.

J&J denied the claim and was said to be considering an appeal. Researchers say links with ovarian cancer are unproven.

A company spokeswoman said: “We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers, and we are disappointed with the outcome of the trial.

“We sympathize with the plaintiff’s family but firmly believe the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence.”

The verdict at the end of the three-week trial was the first time damages have been awarded by an American jury over talc claims.

More than 1,000 similar cases are pending nationwide and lawyers said thousands more could now be filed.

The jury in Fox’s case deliberated for five hours before finding Johnson & Johnson liable for fraud, negligence and conspiracy.

The award constituted $10 million in damages and $62 million in punitive damages.

“This case clearly was a bellwether and clearly the jury has seen the evidence and found it compelling,” said Stanford University law professor Nora Freeman Engstrom. “The jury was distressed by the company’s conduct.”

However, she said the size of the award was unlikely to survive.

“Big jury verdicts do tend to be reined in during the course of the appellate process and I expect that to be the case here,” she said.

Cancer Research UK says evidence for a link between talc use and ovarian cancer is “still uncertain”.

“Even if there is a risk it is likely to be fairly small,” the charity says.

Ovarian cancer charity Ovacome says causes of the disease are still unknown but are likely to be “a combination of many different inherited and environmental factors, rather than one cause such as talc”.

It says that in 2003, results of 16 studies involving 12,000 women showed that using talc increased the risk of ovarian cancer by around a third, and that a 2013 review of American studies involving 18,000 women had similar results for genital, but not general, talcum powder use.

However, it warns that studies of this type “can suffer from bias” and there were “uncertainties” around the results.

“A large well-designed American study in 2000 involving nearly 80,000 women found no link between using talc and the risk of ovarian cancer,” it says.

The charity says that even if using talc does raise the ovarian cancer risk by a third, “to put it into context, smoking and drinking increases the risk of oesophageal cancer by 30 times”.

Source: (BBC)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *