News Feed

October 21, 2016 - Teenager bamboozles England Teenage off-spinner Mehedi Hasan to ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Local weed cultivation on the rise Marijuana cultivation is on the ris ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Pollard vents on his failed UAE tour PORT OF SPAIN, Trinidad – Kie ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Teen faces indecency charge A St George teen who was charged in ... +++ October 21, 2016 - GAIA wage dispute resolution in sight A prolonged and sometimes bitter wa ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Combermere thrash Graydon Sealy Former champions Graydon Sealy had ... +++

New threat

Region stands to lose billions in remittances, warns Arthur

It forms part of the global crackdown against financial crime and international terrorism.

And in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, its focus has been on strengthening financial systems by requiring financial institutions to meet more “exacting” liquidity and capital requirements.

But former Prime Minister Owen Arthur today warned that the phenomenon of correspondent banking poses a “formidable” challenge to Caribbean countries.

Speaking in Jamaica, Arthur highlighted the US$10 billion a year this region receives in remittances, while warning that this, the region’s single largest financial inflow, upon which countless Caribbean households depend for a sustainable livelihood, could be in jeopardy.

“The threat posed by the Correspondent Banking crisis to money services businesses that are involved in dealing with remittances is above all a threat to the stability of the society at large and hence has effectively to be countered,” he said in remarks during a roundtable discussion on Correspondent Banking at the Jamaica Pegasus Hotel this morning.

Arthur, who is a respected economist, further warned that “derisking” which is at the centre of the correspondent banking issue, could serve to delink Caribbean economies from access to global finance at a juncture where they need to increase the ratio of capital inflows to Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

He said it could increase the cost of access to such finance and force economic agents in the region to resort to illicit means, further damaging the image of the region.

“It can also do untold damage to the financial sector in the Caribbean,” Arthur added, while pointing out that the Caribbean’s financial sector was characterized by shallow banking systems, undeveloped and highly concentrated financial markets and domestic currencies that were not internationally traded.

Therefore, he said, the region was “predisposed to having derisking take on a dimension that does not obtain elsewhere and which is more severe than in our jurisdictions”.

Describing the global initiative as “the most recent, but perhaps the potentially most devastating threat to the stable and successful development of the region”, the former prime minister called on the region not to allow itself to become the real but unintended victim.

He said although the Caribbean could not escape from this global initiative, “what it can and must do is to add its voice to those who are insisting that where rules and standards are set which are intended to be applied fairly and uniformly, this should be observed in practice”.

In this regard, Arthur noted that the guidelines promulgated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) required entities to adopt a risk-based approach whereby financial institutions only terminate customer relationships on a case-by-case basis in instances where money laundering and terrorist financing risk could not be mitigated.

He further warned that “the wholesale cutting loose of clients, without evaluating their risks, was not intended to be a substantive part of the fight to combat global financial crime and terrorism,” emphasizing that “the global rules must be made to apply.

Arthur also said there was merit in the region taking a stand in support of a revision of the new stringent liquidity coverage ratios that are part of the Basel III financial requirements.

“Basel III has in fact redefined and reduced the value of correspondent banking balances, and this has brought new adverse dynamics to the economics of the business as it has led to a situation where compliance costs and risks outweigh returns to the enterprises involved,” Arthur said, adding: “It is true, of this matter, as of every other facet of life, that indignation without follow-through is just another way of killing time.”

Arthur, who has been a foremost proponent of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Single Market and Economy (CSME),  also called for a “well-coordinated regional effort” to combat the issue and for the region to ensure that its financial house is in order as far as the rules, standards and enforcement mechanisms in the fight against financial crimes and terrorism are concerned.

2 Responses to New threat

  1. Tony Webster January 20, 2016 at 5:58 am

    Contrary to “conventional wisdom” emanating hereabouts and in the wider Caribbean , mostly those with political axes to grind…these little Caribbean gems set in turquoise are NOT pivots on which the earth spins.

    We have much to be proud of, in various spheres of achievement, but when it comes to global politics, we should not confound ourselves with imaginings that we have an inalienable right to conduct the orchestra at fowl-cock bashments. We have our place in the order of all things. Let the Chinese and Putin place the brakes on errant Presidents (and Congresses) over-and-away…or vice-versa: they are all MUCH bigger cock-roaches, and they also PAY …the orchestra!!

    So long as the world acknowledges “The Dollar” as the ultimate currency, correspondent banking will be their ace-card….in addition to the composition of the Security Council at the U.N.

  2. jrsmith January 20, 2016 at 10:39 am

    Some of the ex, Priminister lines carries credit.. but black people and black countries , carry no sway or say ,as to any part of any important issues in the world , the most important ,black people /countries have no political or financial strength or back bone..
    Our region looked good on the British Empire ,CV, but other than that, we were never allowed to play any part in the so call industrialization, and development, of economic benefits in Barbados or the region..
    Our economic problems , started 50 years ago, by not educating our people to economic business levels ,what ever happens in the world which we played no part of, would always effect us, because we are still not prepared and would plague us till the end of the world if we don’t wise up..,
    We are still not deploying the right type of political management , or consultancy , to set improving standards ,we have not learnt from the developed, world economic failures of the past, the region is always a target , mostly Barbados, for The US ,UK and Canadian Corporates, who is lining up for the one way financial traffic out from they investments mostly from Barbados and few others in the region..


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *