News Feed

October 26, 2016 - Wanted man bulletin Police are seeking the assistance o ... +++ October 26, 2016 - School feeding programmes could help fight NCDs A food and nutrition official has i ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Government has run out of options – Arthur Government’s fiscal policy is inf ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Sick airline A top official of regional airline ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Teachers back away from court threat The Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Beacon supports regulatory move Beacon Insurance Company is giving ... +++

Muslims not suing Government

The local Muslim community has said it did not plan to sue Government over the controversial issue of the wearing of headdress by women of the faith who wish to have official photographs taken at Government offices.

However, Public Relations Officer of the Barbados Muslim Association Suleiman Bulbulia said his group and the Rastafarian community would seek clarification on the policy adopted by various Government departments.

Secretary of the Barbados Muslim Association Sulieman Bulbulia.

Secretary of the Barbados Muslim Association Sulieman Bulbulia.

The two religious groups have objected to a requirement for the women of their faiths to remove their headwear when applying for identification cards, passports and driver’s licences or other official documents. And they plan to meet to discuss the way forward.

The issue came to light in a recent media report which quoted a Muslim woman as saying she was considering suing Government after she was ordered to remove her hijab to take photographs for a national identification card, passport and driver’s licence.

Bulbulia told Barbados TODAY his religion required women to cover their faces in public, and they should be allowed to at least keep their heads covered when they have their photographs taken.

He contended that different Government departments employed different guidelines, with some asking that the headwear be removed completely, while others said it was okay to partially remove it.

“We don’t have any intentions of taking Government to court or taking legal action. What happened is we saw that there was an inconsistency in the policy where some officers would allow it and some wouldn’t. And there is the recognition that the Constitution allows for religious dress, but they are saying now that the rule says you have to take it off,” Bulbulia complained.

House of Nyahbinghi spokesman Bongo Isaiah did not say if the Rastafarians would consider legal action, but he described the practice as “religious intolerance”.

He referred to a case in which one Rastafarian woman went to have her photograph taken for her driver’s license and was told by employees that she must remove her headwear. However, she was later allowed to keep it on after a call was made to a Government official, who in turn called the department, seemingly with instructions to allow the woman to have the picture taken with her headgear on.

“The thing that got me is dem know that this is not a law you know; it is laws that they creating. This here is religious intolerance,” Isaiah contended.

The Rastafarian said he had written to a number of officials in the past voicing his concerns about the issue and calling for the introduction of a standard mutual agreement.

7 Responses to Muslims not suing Government

  1. Veroniva Boyce
    Veroniva Boyce January 1, 2016 at 7:17 am

    In a recent media report which quoted a Muslim woman as saying she was considering suing Government after she was ordered to remove her hijab to take photographs for a national identification card, passport and driver’s licence.
    Sue who? We got news fuh she ALL fancy dress cape crusaders have to show their faces.
    I am proud of the officials in BIM. Safety FIRST!
    Vive lA France!!! Vive la Barbados!!!!

  2. Adrian M Chase
    Adrian M Chase January 1, 2016 at 8:58 am

    ^^^^ smh….here comes the ignorant comments for 2016.

  3. Susan January 1, 2016 at 11:29 am

    I recently read that it is NOT a requirement according to the Koran, for women to cover their faces, or head for that matter. Rather, it is imposed by muslim men. Just 1 more thing to try and control women’s lives. When I see young girls wearing the full niqab in the blazing Barbados sun I equate it with child abuse.

  4. Tony Waterman January 2, 2016 at 12:13 am

    @Susan!!!! i hope that, the Fools who want to Change the rules are aware European Court of Human Rights has UPHELD Frances BAN on the types of Headware, and did not see it as Religious Intolerance, The Court agreed that concealing the face was tantamount to a barrier against others, based on the importance of the face in social interaction, and would breach “the right of others to live in a space of socialization which makes living together easier.” in other words Mr Nyabinghi YOU are Discriminating against us, by NOT letting us see your facial Emotions, which helps us interact with you socially.
    If you decide to go ahead with your foolishness, i hope it ends up at the CCJ, as i am sure that they are aware of the Judgement handed down by the European Court of Human Rights, and will use that judgement as a Precedent.

  5. maxjustina January 2, 2016 at 3:34 pm

    How will we ever attempt to identify a genuine woman or one used by the militant groups?

  6. J. Payne January 3, 2016 at 5:41 pm

    How can France’s judgement be precedent for CCJ when Barbados is no longer part of the ECHR, nor is the CCJ a part of the European Court of Human Rights???? CCJ has to go by what the Constitution of Barbados says and interpret the Barbados Constitution. France is a separate jurisdiction that has no bearing on Barbados.

  7. J. Payne January 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm

    If Barbados had to go by other jurisdictions than Barbados would be required to give up all laws on homosexuals immediately.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *