Sailor walks free of foul language charge
A Barbados Coast Guard soldier, who was charged with using insubordinate language to a superior officer, was freed this afternoon only after about ten minutes of deliberations by a three-member court martial.
Ordinary seaman Christopher Broomes was found not guilty by the tribunal, presided over by its president Major Christopher Birch when it met in the Hodgson Hall Conference Room of the Barbados Defence Force Headquarters, St Ann’s Forte, The Garrison.
It was alleged that on Tuesday, April 7, 2015, while at HMBS Pelican – Coast Guard Headquarters – at approximately 4.50 p.m., when instructed by Leading Seaman Adam Sealy not to leave the compound dressed in physical training (PT) attire, Broomes replied: “You can’t be meaning f…… me.”
The ten year service officer was also charged with behaving in a manner unbecoming a sailor, but was only tried on the first count.
After hearing all the evidence and arguments from the prosecution team led by Sub Lieutenant Rita Evans in association with Captain Andrew Darlington and the defence attorney Vincent Watson, tribunal president Birch, who is also a magistrate in the non-military court, chastised Broomes before giving the decision.
“The Barbados Defence Force is a disciplined force. You cannot afford after ten years in the service to be [exhibiting] . . . bad manners, bad judgment and insubordination.
“Once you have been told an order had been issued, it is for you to comply. Once you had heard the [executive officer] had said that no one was to leave in PT wear, that was the end of the issue as far as you are concerned . . . no debate, no discussion, no ‘I’m going to the the gate’”, contended the court martial president.
In his decision, Birch declared: “That said, you are found not guilty and you are released. Carry on.”
He then ordered the court martial closed without any reference to the second charge.
The freed sailor and his attorney left the court smiling and paused for a photograph from the waiting Press.
In this matter, the prosecution called four witnesses while the defence summoned two.