News Feed

October 21, 2016 - Off the job The industrial relations climate at ... +++ October 21, 2016 - No noose A recent study by this country’s ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Round eight ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates  ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Church’s appeal Don’t mess with religious educati ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Bail clash Prominent criminal attorney Andrew ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Rare marine mammal stranding When two juvenile spotted dolphins ... +++

Let’s have full debate on the death penalty!

Barbados has gone nearly three decades without imposing the death penalty, though it remains on the country’s law books. But this weekend came a strong reminder that the issue is not a silent one for some,
even if they are far beyond our shores.

On Saturday, the globe observed World Day Against The Death Penalty, and with it came the message from the European Union for the Caribbean to take the “emotions” away from the debate on the death penalty and to abolish hanging as punishment for capital murder.

Said head of the European Union delegation to Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, Ambassador Mikael Barford: “The EU sees the death penalty as cruel and inhumane; and scientific research has shown that the death penalty in no way acts as a deterrent to crime. Its abolition is essential for the protection of human dignity, as well as for the progressive development of human rights.

Ambassador Mikael Barford

Ambassador Mikael Barford

“This is a moral issue about the value of human life. As a deeply religious Caribbean society, this is one of the basic tenets that as a community we hold dear. Sentiments such as ‘it is cheaper to kill them then to keep them in prison’ have no place in this era of civilization,”
he stated.

Equally, proponents could argue that capital punishment should be used as a rare option for the most heinous crimes; a punishment carried out not as a deterrent, but as a true penalty for those we are certain deserve it.

The EU official went on to register his satisfaction that Barbados had not executed any convicted killers since 1984 and that the last execution in the Caribbean was carried out in St Kitts/Nevis in 2008.

The fact is our authorities have already demonstrated that the country is moving in line with the expectations of the European Union.

We recall Attorney General Adriel Brathwaite in January piloting the Offences Against The Person Act which effectively gave judges a range of options for sentencing those convicted of murder. Mr Brathwaite explained that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty was being changed in keeping with Barbados’ obligations under the Inter-American Convention On Human Rights.

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has long ruled that the mandatory death penalty violates Articles 4(1) and 4(2) –– which prohibit arbitrary treatment and limit the death penalty to the most serious crimes –– of the Inter-American Convention On Human Rights.

But from Barbadians, who are now almost weekly jolted by senseless shootings and other worrying crimes, the Government and the EU ambassador would find it difficult to get any support. Cries for justice have been mounting from grieving families robbed of their loved ones. And they too have a valid case.

While we cannot say beyond a shadow of doubt that the death penalty is a deterrent to violent crime, we aver there is some substance in that credo held for centuries: let the punishment fit the crime.

On neither side of the divide can the death penalty be treated with kid gloves. It requires strong action, and there must be consensus on how the issue is handled.

It is for this reason that we support Ambassador’s Barford’s position that leaders should show more courage, and launch a meaningful public debate. This tendency to keep things under the carpet has failed in every instance.

The issues are numerous. Is the death penalty a real deterrent? Should a killer be allowed to dole out death but get life? What are appropriate means of administering justice? Should Barbados abandon the death penalty because it is difficult to administer or because of international pressure?

What do the people want?

All profound questions, no doubt; and it’s appropriate that citizens, experts, victims and authorities all have their say in providing the answers.

The time has passed for the debate to begin.

4 Responses to Let’s have full debate on the death penalty!

  1. Danielle Reid-Melillo
    Danielle Reid-Melillo October 12, 2015 at 9:49 pm

    They need to bring it back.

  2. carson c cadogan October 13, 2015 at 8:25 am

    There is no need for any debate on the Death penalty. The Govt. of Barbados under the Barbados Labour Party signed the Inter-american convention of the Death penalty on behalf of the people of Barbados sometime around 2002. It agreed that the Death Penalty would be removed and up to this day the Govt. has not honoured its commitment to an International standard.

    The Govt. of Barbados is in breach of International Law.

    • Sue Donym October 15, 2015 at 8:51 pm

      @carson c cadogan. Your assertions are incorrect. Barbados has not agreed to remove the death penalty. Please read paragraphs 8 and 9 and understand the nature of the ICHR treaty. This applies to the MANDATORY imposition of the death penalty. The end of paragraph 9 confirms the ability to invoke the death penalty in “the most serious crimes”

  3. Sue Donym October 15, 2015 at 9:04 pm

    The debate goes this way:
    One side says let’s do it.
    The other said says let’s do away with it
    That’s it, pretty much. Then what?

    If a binding referendum is being suggested, that’s a different matter, but no stand-alone debate is going to elicit anything new or solve anything


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *