News Feed

October 28, 2016 - Case dismissed The case brought by the Ministry of ... +++ October 28, 2016 - Employees pampered As Education Month draws to a close ... +++ October 28, 2016 - ‘Take big view of agriculture’ GEORGE TOWN, Cayman Islands– Sta ... +++ October 28, 2016 - NUPW reacts to Lowe’s comments on privatization The island’s largest public secto ... +++ October 28, 2016 - BUT warns of new militant approach The Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT ... +++ October 28, 2016 - Cameron expresses confidence in Windies women KINGSTON, Jamaica – West Indi ... +++

Stay out!

Economist says Govt has no place in certain businesses

The Barbados economy is in trouble and Trinidad and Tobago is “looking over a precipice”.

This assessment today from former deputy governor of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago, Dr Terrence Farrell, as he engaged members of the local business community attending the September luncheon of the Barbados Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI).

The economist argued that regional governments had no business offering services that could be better provided by the private sector. He said governments should only intervene in the market if a case existed for some kind of rescuing to be done.

Dr Farrell singled out telecommunications, the news media, insurance and banking as examples of services where governments should not be involved today. In cases where governments have started businesses, he said, they should hand them over to the private sector once they were free of risks.

IMG_4588“All of those things should be in the hands of the private sector, unless you want to use the media to promote your political party. So you have no business being in those things,” said Dr Farrell, in response to a question from the audience.

He said it was common in the Caribbean for “the business to lose focus and go off mission” under state ownership. “And all of that comes back to the treasury, it comes back to taxpayers who have to foot that bill,” he observed.

Farrell added: “The second thing that happens is that even when they are making money, governments like to hold on to these things for reasons of patronage. I could put my people inside there, this person wants a job, this person wants to become chairman and so on and so forth.”

“So governments need to be disciplined when they do own the industry, they need to be disciplined about keeping that business on mission and then making the critical decision about when are we going to release it and privatize it and put it into the private sector.

That is what our governments are failing to do. They are holding on to businesses that they should let go. Profit-making businesses, they should let them go and the loss making businesses they keep them,” suggested Farrell.

“When economies get into trouble…and in those circumstances governments need to retrench, the question
of the privatization of state enterprises and utilities tends to resurface because governments get themselves into a situation where they need revenues,” the Trinidadian economist noted.

“It is also the case that when that happens, the private sector pays attention because privatization represents in many respects, an opportunity for those of us in the private sector to make some investment,”

He said the trade union movement was generally “opposed to privatization” because of the fact that governments generally did not oppose unionization of workers in state enterprises and statutory corporations.

“But the real reason why unions love state ownership is that featherbedding becomes the norm,” said Farrell, who also urged regional authorities to carry out careful research when seeking to get involved in private public sector partnerships.

3 Responses to Stay out!

  1. Brimstone September 24, 2015 at 11:11 am

    This is perfectly true. We just need to remember the sterling job Port Contractors did in the early days of bulk cargo in Barbados, then the government took ownership and everything went to hell.

  2. J. Payne September 24, 2015 at 11:13 pm

    Tell that to Europe. Namely France and Germany…. Heck the German government own’s T-Mobile which sells mobile phone service in America. The Canadian government owns a NUMBER of Crown Corporations too including There’s nothing wrong with governments owning companies. However, those companies need to function with aim of being global to produce ROI, **AND** they need the correct or appropriate leadership managing them, not just political appointees without free hand to be able to make un-popular cuts. I mean look for example that Vancouver Airport Services not only manages airport in Canada, it also manages airports in Jamaica, The Commonwealth of the Bahamas, Chile, and Cyprus. If Caribbean countries could get their act together they could probably get the contract to manage airports across the world too. Esp Cuba if they had played their cards right.

  3. J.Payne September 29, 2015 at 1:04 am

    @Hal. Exactly… IMAGINE. The Barbados Government owned Barbados National Bank… It’s value was little, and when the Government of the Kingdom of Barbados sold it’s majority stake to a certain bank, the value of the shares retained are rumored to have been worth more than when the government owned 100% of the company…. How de tail does that happen? Did the Barbados government have the right leadership running BNB? Put another way, if the Barbados Government hired someone like Robert Le Hunte directly and retained 100% imagine how much money Barbados would have made holding majority stake. Then again, do Barbados government companies file timely financial statements and hold people accountable for wrong doing?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *