News Feed

October 24, 2016 - Colombians arrested and charged Police have arrested and charged tw ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Man on firearm and ammo charge Police have arrested and charged 54 ... +++ October 24, 2016 - 62-year-old St Lucy resident missing Police are seeking the assistance o ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Today’s weather A tropical wave is affecting the is ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Police probe death at Golden Ridge, St George Police are investigating the sudden ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Possible funding for NGOs The Division of Economic Affairs ha ... +++

No signs of abuse

Child Care Board explains Jahan’s injuries

The bruises around the eye of the six year old Jahan King were the result of allergies, and there were no signs of physical abuse when officers of the Child Care Board (CCB) examined the boy, the state-run child protection agency has said.

The boy was rushed to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) by ambulance on Sunday June 28 and died early the following morning. His maternal grandmother, Margaret Gill, has contended that he had been abused, seemingly by his mother, Lasonta Gill and her boyfriend, Dwayne Marshall, and that the CCD had failed to act. Photographs circulating on social media appeared to support the claim, with some showing Jahan with bruises and a swollen eye.

However, in an interview with Barbados TODAY Child Care Board Chairman Kenneth Knight revealed that that records obtained from a medical examiner revealed no signs of abuse.

Child Care Board Chairman Kenneth Knight

Child Care Board Chairman Kenneth Knight

“The child was reported by the grandmother in terms of incurring these bruises. We did call in the family and . . . the child was taken to a physician, [he] was examined, they returned with a certificate from the registered medical practitioner indicating that in his view the bruises which occured or were seen around the child’s eye were the result of allergies, and there were no sort of traumatic wounds, which were visible. This was the view of the medical practitioner in the certificate that was presented to the Child Care Board,” Knight said.

He said that sometime in May the child was reported to have sustained a broken hand, later diagnosed as a fractured finger, and family members, including the child, were interviewed.

Knight said it was determined that the injury was sustained when Jahan fell while alighting from a bus.

“. . . the child said he fell from a bus. He jumped off the bus and it is there where he incurred the wound. Apparently his hand was set in a cast and as a result of this, it was determined that he jumped off.  He did say this to the officer,” reported the agency boss.

He added that the grandmother reported to the board that the boy had a history of  jumping off buses, and this was not the first time he had fallen while doing so.

“So seeing that this was an established pattern with the young man in jumping off buses . . . . On this occasion he got hurt and this was attributed to the last case that we saw him,” Knight recalled.

The child protection agency head revealed that Jahan and his grandmother were at the CCB office on Friday, June 25, just three days before his death, and he did not exhibit any signs that suggested that anything was wrong with him.

In fact, he said the boy was “very” playful, did not sit in a chair but walked around the office, and behaved like “any normal six year old would” during the visit.

Jahan with his mother, Lasonta Gill.

Jahan with his mother, Lasonta Gill.

He defended his officers who examined Jahan during the last visit, saying they followed the correct procedures and they found no signs of abuse.

“Of course in these situations you do stick a red flag and you follow through on the process. And it was clear to me and the other board members that the officers attending to the particular case had followed the various processes and protocols required in a case like this,” he argued.

“As you can appreciate, the child care officers, they . . . are not there as a policeman, they are there to keep families together, to get to the depth of the problem and I believe with their knowledge of such situations, I think that they were on the right track in terms of what they were trying to establish. Was this child being abused?”

The chairman also pointed out that after Jahan died, all officers, including Director Joan Crawford, were interviewed as part of an internal investigation. In the end, he said the CCB could not pronounce on the cause of death.

“We do not know what this child died from. We speculate. We do not know the cause of death.  We have to be very careful, especially as a statutory agency, how we react to these circumstances and particularly as it relates the release of information . . . . You may have the post mortem done and you may have a coroner’s inquest which takes a legal framework and that’s where the law steps in.”

A post mortem on Jahan’s body was carried out today and the results are pending.

6 Responses to No signs of abuse

  1. Daniel Polonis
    Daniel Polonis July 8, 2015 at 6:54 am

    So why abandon the boy at the hospital?…and why didn’t she treat the allergies? Where is the pediatricians confirmation of severe allergies? At the end of the day you have a dead child and dysfunctional family and “protective agency”. The dead only know one thing, it is better to be alive.

  2. Donna July 8, 2015 at 9:40 am


  3. Donna July 8, 2015 at 9:47 am

    So why all the talk about being short staffed and why all the comments from Faith Marshall-Harris? And it’s really strange that these allergies so severe in nature surfaced so acutely only after the move from his prior residences? At the very least they should have been treated aggressively. And what about Shamar Weekes? No signs of abuse there either? Steupse.

  4. lswiltshire July 8, 2015 at 11:05 am


  5. Bajan July 8, 2015 at 11:13 pm

    Why is he DEAD????
    From allergies?

  6. Olutoye Walrond July 9, 2015 at 4:34 am

    First time I’m being made aware that allergies cause bruises. I know they cause swelling, but bruises….?

    This, then, must have been one unlucky child. From centepede bites to allergies, to falling off buses to asthma….wow!

    Am I to understand that a 6-year-old child was being allowed to travel on a bus unsupervised? And if he was supervised why was he allowed to fall?

    And what about the little girl’s story about the incident involving the step-father and the boy’s remarks to her about having to keep silent?

    Too many questions


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *