News Feed

October 27, 2016 - United win Manchester derby Juan Mata struck to win a tight Man ... +++ October 27, 2016 - IAAF wants Bolt’s services KINGSTON, Jamaica – IAAF Pres ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Proper shutdown protocol needed, says Bynoe The Department of Emergency Managem ... +++ October 27, 2016 - ‘Out of touch’ Economist Ryan Straughn says the la ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Lowe looking to protect the south coast A senior policymaker has warned tha ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Road Hockey 5s hit halfway mark After three weeks of competition th ... +++

NIS looking to crackdown on professionals too

Professionals have been put on notice that they could soon require clearance from the National Insurance Scheme (NIS).

This follows the recent Budget announcement that they must have a tax clearance certificate from the Barbados Revenue Authority (BRA) to practise in Barbados.

Minister of Labour Dr Esther Byer made the disclosure to reporters this evening, while pointing out the dwindling NIS Fund was challenged due mainly to people not making their contributions.

Minister of Labour Dr Esther Byer

Minister of Labour Dr Esther Byer

“It was in the last Budget speech that the Minister [of Finance] spoke to tax clearance certificates for professionals. National Insurance is also moving in a similar direction. So those professionals would need to say that they are compliant with National Insurance as well before they move forward,” warned Dr Byer.

“That is just a proposal at this point, but you can see then where it would be useful and necessary to have certainly a relationship and a sharing of information between the BRA and the National Insurance [Scheme],” she said.

She revealed that the Government would be looking seriously at the issue of “formalizing the economy”, which should see more people who are currently being considered informal becoming formal and making their contribution to the NIS fund.

“If we can get the persons in the informal economy to contribute, which is more important now that we are fazing our the non-contributory pension, before a lot of persons in the informal economy would not pay NIS, those self employed persons, but they knew that when the time came they could have employed for a non-contributory pension. They can’t do that anymore so they need to realize that they need to contribute now,” she explained.

The announcement that professionals now require a tax clearance certificate has caused a number of service industry operators to express concern that businesses could be forced to close, not as a result of them not going forward for the certificate but the ability of the BRA to issue those certificates in a timely manner given its teething problems.

6 Responses to NIS looking to crackdown on professionals too

  1. Adrian Reid
    Adrian Reid June 30, 2015 at 6:06 am

    I could see a war on the horizon you could see it too

  2. Roger Manning
    Roger Manning June 30, 2015 at 7:17 am

    If the government would stop taking the NIS funds, like it is a piggy bank, the NIS financial account would be stable. No communist approach to governance would be necessary.

  3. Seth St John
    Seth St John June 30, 2015 at 7:31 am

    As much as the dems are constantly condemning the bees, I must say, under Owen, the NIS was healthy

  4. Patrick Blackman June 30, 2015 at 8:39 am

    This focus on Professionals is quite stupid, the NIS internal controls should be such that any delinquent should be accorded the same treatment. If they had a proper risk analysis system in place , this group would have been identified as a concentration of risks in past so this is nothing new, move on.

  5. Watchman June 30, 2015 at 9:11 am

    So according to Manning above, the issue is not that people who should pay NIS do not, rather that the government takes the money.
    That’s just a terrific sentiment of so much in Bim right there.

  6. Panwallie June 30, 2015 at 10:11 pm

    Is this the same Dr Suckoo who spoke earlier about liquid assets and the fluidity of the NIS? Oh how quickly things have changed! Or is it that she was not being accurately informed?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *