News Feed

October 25, 2016 - Vehicle overturns at Warrens Police say no injuries were reporte ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Digital direction Send and receive money digitally, e ... +++ October 25, 2016 - GG winding down school visits In a matter of weeks, once all goes ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Husbands, Walcott brilliant in Canada TORONTO, Canada – Veteran Bar ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Many positives on Windies A tour DAMBULLA, Sri Lanka – Head co ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Dismissal of iMart cashier raises eyebrows The Labour Department is said to be ... +++

Hypocritical and grossly discriminatory!

The outgoing president of the Barbados International Business Association (BIBA) is not at all happy about the recent blacklisting by Barbados of some European Union (EU) states, which have branded the island as a non-cooperative tax haven that does not meet their standards of transparency and information exchange.

In fact, Connie Smith believes the move is nothing short of “hypocritical and grossly discriminatory”.

“I would certainly like to challenge the integrity of this new blacklist,” said Smith.

She also asked: “Do any of the EU member states have any major tax investigations with any companies domiciled in Barbados or have they made a request for any tax information that has not been provided?”

The BIBA official further noted that the island did not have any “active trading arrangements” with a number of the EU member states which have blacklisted it, including Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Croatia and Bulgaria.

She further questioned “the partiality of the list when it comes to some of their own EU members”.

“First of all, it does not mention Luxemburg, Ireland or the Netherlands who are currently under investigation by the EU competition authorities for facilitating aggressive tax avoidance,” Smith pointed out, adding “it is alleged that Luxembourg, for example, had entered into 548 private tax rulings to allow over 300 of the largest companies in the world to avoid paying taxes in EU countries.”

However, the BIBA executive said this was “an ideal opportunity to reposition Barbados with those that considered it appropriate to tarnish us”.

“I would very much like to have Barbados enter into discussions with those EU member states who have so listed us, with a view of gathering details as to why they placed Barbados on a blacklist and what criteria they used to arrive at this assessment; and engaging in bilateral discussions which could hopefully conclude in double taxation agreements and bilateral investment treaties with a number of them,” she said.

Pointing out that there was support from a number of officials in the sector, as well as EU officials here, Smith said BIBA would continue to do its part in keeping the international business community informed of the regulatory environment, which was continuously being enhanced.

Smith said she believed the Global Forum meeting to be held in Barbados later this year would be “a grand opportunity to infuse that important global body with a better understanding of Barbados as a credible international business and financial services centre and the value it adds to global trade and to the economies of the developed world as the findings of Professor Walid Hejazi of the Rotman School of Business”.

Source: (PR)

One Response to Hypocritical and grossly discriminatory!

  1. Nathaniel Anderson June 29, 2015 at 2:24 am

    Mia had every right to bring the matter of Cahill to the Parliament when she did during the debates. Importantly this is a project that is scheduled to start in September- a project which will therefore have significant and serious financial implications for this country, yet was not even mentioned during the budget presentation by the Finance Minister but only until Ms. Mottley’s presentation.
    As far as Minister Lowe is concerned, he had ample time to produce his document but used his time when he produced it to talk all over the place without even touching the most important project that he is charged with. His waste management responsibility was completely disregarded and he should have been immediately sacked for dereliction of duty.
    Shame on the attorney-general who ought to know better than to suggest that he would look into Ms. Mottley’s right to practise here. Here is a lady who has represented this country in an international matter that went to the Privy Council – and she won. Hopefully an unreserved and swift apology is due when he makes his checks and sees that she is indeed able to practise here. What clownish behaviour!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *