News Feed

October 28, 2016 - Case dismissed The case brought by the Ministry of ... +++ October 28, 2016 - Employees pampered As Education Month draws to a close ... +++ October 28, 2016 - ‘Take big view of agriculture’ GEORGE TOWN, Cayman Islands– Sta ... +++ October 28, 2016 - NUPW reacts to Lowe’s comments on privatization The island’s largest public secto ... +++ October 28, 2016 - BUT warns of new militant approach The Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT ... +++ October 28, 2016 - Cameron expresses confidence in Windies women KINGSTON, Jamaica – West Indi ... +++


Preconco blows the whistle on damaging game of ‘political football’


That’s how shareholders in Preconco Limited today described Opposition Leader Mia Mottley’s claims in Parliament this week that the company has been getting both preferential treatment and pricing from the Freundel Stuart Government.

In a clear-the-air statement, which also followed suggestions made by Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler that its owner Mark Maloney, as well as two other leading local businessmen – Bjorn Bjerkhamn and Sir Charles Williams – were among the beneficiaries of a 99-year lease issued by the former administration on the eve of the 2008 elections which swept the Barbados Labour Party from office, Preconco denied any involvement in that project.

Shareholders also said they were not at all happy that the company was being used somewhat like a “political football” by members on both sides of the political divide.

Mark Maloney

Mark Maloney

“We will not sit and hide and wait for time to pass for people to forget what has been said about us but would prefer to speak on the matters that have been raised and try to clear the air the best we can,” said
Preconco in the statement emailed to Barbados TODAY by Maloney.

The company pointed out that over its 25-year life, it had worked on “most large Government projects with both administrations”. However, it said this was “for the simple reason of being able to have the products and services that were required to meet the projects requirements”.

“Some of these are as follows: the prison, judicial center, Kensington Oval, Bridgetown Port projects, ABC highway projects, Swan Street beautification, Valery, Grotto, molasses tanks, NIS buildings to name a few,” the statement said, adding that “we were not involved in some of the projects that our name was being called for in parliament and have asked for a retraction of this”.

“The Minister of Finance, in his closing address, has addressed the comments made on pricing on both the Grotto and Valery projects and has given the facts on the pricing for these, which shows that the rates are in line with reasonable prices and also in line with past pricing on similar projects undertaken.

“It is being claimed that Preconco undertook some of these, but the truth is that the company acted as a sub-contractor for most, and the ones that it took the lead on, it was involved in arranging a design, build and finance arrangement which went through extensive regulatory requirements with various corporations, boards, banks, legal and other requirements and we see no wrongdoing in anything we have done,” Preconco explained in the statement.

It went on: “Every project that we work on has been done with full transparency and what is being portrayed by some as being out of place, is inaccurate and misleading to the public”.

“We are not divided by or politically motivated and do not like being used as a political football for individuals agendas but do understand that what is discussed in Parliament isn’t subject to any legal action because individuals are immune under the laws of Parliament.

“We will continue to strive for excellence and to work hard to bring investment to Barbados and to develop our businesses in the industries we are in and will work to be involved in all projects that have opportunities that suit our group’s portfolio.

“We do think that Government’s role is to facilitate investment and by so doing we will continue to look at opportunities that bring investment to Barbados and to continue to develop our products and services to be able to be a part of all opportunities that present themselves to our group and will work with the Government to ensure that facilitation is sought where needed,” the statement added.

6 Responses to Offside!

  1. Prince Nicholas
    Prince Nicholas June 19, 2015 at 6:30 am

    These ppl really want to take us for fools

  2. carson c cadogan June 19, 2015 at 6:50 am

    I wonder why the Barbados Labour Party is so allergic to the TRUTH.

  3. Rawle Maycock
    Rawle Maycock June 19, 2015 at 7:16 am

    Mark Maloney, you have said nothing to prove that the accusations are incorrect, why didn’t you quote the prices that was mentioned, that’s the point.

  4. Realist June 19, 2015 at 10:30 am

    If you are not getting the preferential treatment, tell us who is getting it. To compound the insult, are you one of those companies who pay one hundred nasty dollars per day to skilled workers, not labourers but as I said before “skilled artisans?” You along with the owners of R&R, JADA and others (the culprits know to whom I am referring) pay extremely low wages with lots of demands. On the other hand you make sure that you charge the government top dollars with all the concessions so that you can but sunscreen, night coats and the best feed for your Polo Ponies. Infact you and the other culprits spend more to feed a Polo Pony per day than what you pay a worker to feed and cloth his wife and children per week. This fool..h government that we elected cannot see these things but walking around blindly thinking that you and the other vagadounds are assets to the society…yes you can be when you start to filter down the perks. Anyway my time is up, I am going to cook my breadfruit.

  5. Patrick Blackman June 19, 2015 at 11:46 am

    If memory serves me right we are suppose to have a tendering process, if Mia thinks that process is some how corrupted, then she needs to have it reviewed by the Auditor General. When this review is completed then we pass the findings to the Attroney General and the Commissioner of Police. Simple as that, no need to use the “house” as a cover for your statements and accusations. As the leader of the opposition I am assuming you should be able to initiate such things. Simple matter, lets move on now.

  6. David June 22, 2015 at 10:40 am

    Both BLP & DLP are the same. While in opposition each party accuses each other of corruption. These parties really believe Barbadians are stupid.
    Under the BLP government we had the scandal with the GEMS project and Hardwood Housing Inc. What became of the forensic audits into those entities?
    Particular interest groups always benefit from both of these discredited political parties.Those interest groups members do not look or live like the vast majority of the other Barbadians
    The charade continues


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *