Court muzzled

Former magistrate wants greater freedom to speak

It has recently come in for a bashing from various quarters for among other things, its slow delivery of justice.

However, the newly appointed Registrar of the Supreme Court Barbara Cooke-Alleyne said yesterday it was a pity that in all cases the local judiciary was not allowed to defend its own name.

As holder of the number two administrative post in the island’s Supreme Court and a former magistrate, Cooke-Alleyne said she was forced to remain silent on issues, even in instances where the “licks” the judiciary was getting from members of the public were based on blatant untruths.

The former magistrate therefore feels the time is ripe for the court to break with tradition, and allow officers more freedom to speak their minds.

Registrar of the Supreme Court Barbara Cooke-Alleyne
Newly appointed Registrar of the Supreme Court Barbara Cooke-Alleyne

“Sometimes you say things in the Press about us and we would love to respond, but the tradition is we don’t respond, we take the licks, and we can’t respond,” she said.

However, Cooke-Alleyne argued that the court needed to operate as if it was in the 21st century so that officers could “respond to things that are said to say whether they are true and whether we are fixing it.

“We don’t have the opportunity under this tradition that we are in to respond,” she stressed.

Among those who have been highly critical of the Barbados judiciary in recent months is the president of the Trinidad-based Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), Sir Denys Byron, who back in February accused the judiciary in Barbados of not delivering justice in a timely manner, while strongly condemning the local courts for “excessive and inordinate” delays in resolving cases.

Earlier this month, Barbadian Queen’s Counsel Andrew Pilgrim, QC, went as far as to describe the country’s judicial system as “a joke”, amid uncertainty over whether the Crown would proceed with a murder case that had been pending for the past four years.

“We are incapable of guaranteeing anyone a trial within a reasonable time,” Pilgrim told acting Magistrate Alliston Seale in the District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Court. “If you plead guilty to a speeding ticket, you cannot get a trial within a year.”

The top brass of the Barbados Bar Association had also complained during a news conference in February that the association had to supply chairs for clients and attorneys to sit on while conducting business in the High Court.

3 Responses to Court muzzled

  1. Mark Jones May 14, 2015 at 8:57 am

    Madam Registrar with all due respect, there is no defence. The system seems to have more red tape now than before. Why or why in the 21st century must an appointment be made to request a probate file, for documents to be filed on it? Why can birth certificates only be collected from 11:30 a.m with a registry full of people strolling up and down and chatting? The Registry is inefficient and backward. Frankly, I would like to see less chatter in the press and that energy put in to having our registry and court system put back on track.

  2. Watchman May 14, 2015 at 9:46 am

    Actions speak louder than words. Get to work by eliminating the unreasonable delays.
    Why should anyone be waiting years for a criminal or civil matter to be heard ?
    I am sure you may have many reasons why the delays occur, but please deliver solutions to remedy that rather than defending your ego.

  3. Rawle Spooner
    Rawle Spooner May 14, 2015 at 4:27 pm

    The justice system in Barbados friggin joke takes years to hear cases, justice delayed is justice denied Madame.Please let them speak would be nice to hear why cases takes years to reach a conclusion.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *