News Feed

October 25, 2016 - Flow Study help Students preparing for the Grade Si ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Police officer dies suddenly The Royal Barbados Police Force is ... +++ October 25, 2016 - St Peter woman arrested and charged A 26-year-old St Peter woman has be ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Vehicle overturns at Warrens Police say no injuries were reporte ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Digital direction Send and receive money digitally, e ... +++ October 25, 2016 - GG winding down school visits In a matter of weeks, once all goes ... +++

Dr Gonsalves protocol lapse is regrettable

In a Front Page exclusive in its April 29 edition, Barbados TODAY broke the news of an embarrassing incident at the Grantley Adams International Airport (GAIA), taking place two weeks earlier, in which St Vincent and the Grenadines’ Prime Minister Dr Ralph Gonsalves was subjected to a security check like any ordinary passenger.

Dr Gonsalves was passing through Barbados, having arrived on a LIAT flight from Guyana, to catch a connecting flight home. As he was not accompanied by either a protocol or police special branch officer, which is standard procedure for visiting heads of government and other dignitaries, the usual courtesies were not extended.

As a result, Dr Gonsalves found himself having to undergo security screening, as with regular passengers. An alarm was reportedly triggered during the initial screening, prompting a request for him to undergo a second screening and to take off his shoes.

At this point, Dr Gonsalves reportedly protested, and additional security officers were summoned to the scene.

This unfortunate incident, resulting from an obvious lapse on the part of Barbados authorities, has generated a fair amount of discussion on social media since Barbados TODAY broke the story. Based on some of the comments, the episode has only served to reinforce the perception of Barbados as a country that is unwelcoming to regional visitors.

Pictures of the actual incident, presumably taken with a cellphone, were also posted online showing Dr Gonsalves, standing next to the screening station as other passengers at Gate 9 looked on.

Dr Gonsalves is one of the most high-profile and easily recognizable of CARICOM leaders. Clearly, however, the security officer who interfaced with him in this instance did not know who he was. Otherwise, her response most likely would have been different.

She should not be condemned, therefore, for doing her job, as she was trained to, even though her action resulted in embarrassment. The buck must stop higher up. Dr Gonsalves reportedly received an apology from the management of GAIA before he departed the same evening. And an official investigation has also been launched.

According to the information provided by the source of our story, Dr Gonsalves’ flight from Guyana was delayed and he arrived in Barbados later than originally planned. What needs to be explained, if this information was known to the relevant authorities, is why the usual courtesies were not in place when he arrived. Existing arrangements clearly merit a review to determine how this lapse occurred, so that the necessary corrective action can be taken to avoid a similar occurrence in the future.

As airport security officers interface with people from all walks of life, it is important, as this incident has highlighted, that their training should include exposure to relevant information that would allow them to recognize at least regional dignitaries like prime ministers, cabinet ministers and senior CARICOM officials when they are passing through the airport.

Had the officer who screened Dr Gonsalves been the beneficiary of such training, she would have been in a position to instantly recognize who he was and, instead of subjecting him to a regular security check, could have alerted the relevant authorities that he was unaccompanied by a protocol or police special branch officer, so that they could have immediately come and extended the usual courtesies.

The lapse raises a serious issue related to Dr Gonsalves’ own security. While such incidents have never occurred here and is highly unlikely, suppose someone in the terminal, recognizing who he was, had decided to show aggression to the Vincentian leader on realizing a window of opportunity, due to the fact that he was unaccompanied. Barbados would have suffered major embarrassment.

The security of our leaders is an issue which cannot be taken for granted, given the craziness that is happening in the world today and to which the Caribbean is vulnerable. At least, Barbados was lucky on this occasion.

Since the incident is public knowledge, we hope at least a summary of the findings of the official probe will be made known to all. It is also our hope, coming out of this investigation, that better protocol and security arrangements for visiting dignitaries will be put in place, so there will not be a repeat of the same lapse, leaving Barbados facing the fallout from another embarrassment of this kind.

3 Responses to Dr Gonsalves protocol lapse is regrettable

  1. darrelanderson
    darrelanderson May 5, 2015 at 8:38 pm

    how were we to know he was Bill Clinton?!? His passport said “William”….

  2. Average Joe May 5, 2015 at 10:15 pm

    Am I the only one curious about why the alarm went off in the first place?

    Even if it was not standard, or he felt insulted in some form or fashion, protesting at security, especially after an alarm has sounded is no way for a leader to act…unless he has something to hide.

  3. Hackney Lahsram May 6, 2015 at 11:43 am

    I am really disappointed at the editorial writer of this column. It is very easy to appropriate blame on the defenseless security personnel who is only trying to do her/her job as best they could. If the airline personnel who dispatched the flight from Guyana had past on the VIP list to the transit and destination airline personnel, this incident would not have occurred. Airline staff are responsible for communicating and putting all information to the relevant personnel at the destination and transiting places for the safety and ease of passage for these VIP’s.
    Had the editor just ask what is the protocol for VIP’s, then they would not have needlessly castigate the lower level employees who are trying to guard our safety.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *