News Feed

October 27, 2016 - Switch to solar power still too expensive, complains Clarke Member of Parliament for St George ... +++ October 27, 2016 - TVET council looking to improve its offerings – McClean The Barbados Technical Vocational E ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Skills lacking A recent survey has found that Barb ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Selectors axe King ST JOHN’S, Antigua – Ba ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Much ado about nothing, says Arthur Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur i ... +++ October 27, 2016 - Wrong way Don’t rule out privatization! Thi ... +++


Church leaders caution against pulling plug on terminal patients at QEH

Don’t even consider it!

That was the reaction of religious leader and Government Senator Dr David Durant to a suggestion by chief executive officer of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Dr Dexter James that authorities may have to consider discontinuing treatment for some terminally ill patients.

Delivering a lecture yesterday on the topic Is Free Health Care Sustainable? the hospital administrator said it was time to have a serious conversation on the issue, as it could be one way of saving on escalating health care costs.

But Reverend Durant, who heads Restoration Ministries, contended that every family should have the right to see their relative pass away with dignity, and should not have to be taken off life support.

Senator Reverend David Durant

Senator Reverend David Durant

“I think that’s the best the nation can do for someone who lived their life in this island and may [get] terminally ill. Perhaps, they can be healed as well because with God, all things are possible if you only believe. So, at some time that person can be healed and completely restored and taking them off life support is going to negate that possibility from happening,” he told Barbados TODAY.

“I believe that people should, at least, be given that respect and that compassion to leave this earth with dignity rather than being forced by reason of cost. Money is spent elsewhere doing all sorts of things.”

While Anglican Bishop Dr John Holder did not rule out the possibility, he said Barbados should proceed on this issue with caution.

He questioned who would make the determination that measures used to keep a person alive should be stopped.

Bishop Dr John Holder

Bishop Dr John Holder

“If we approach it primarily from the perspective that the person may die anyway, and we are simply prolonging the case knowing that the person is going to die, that is an approach I think that would raise a number of issues because if we hold on to the position that the person should be given care as long as is humanly possible, the question will always arise ‘at what point should we stop that care’?” he said.

Bishop Holder said there was no easy answer to the challenge and it required far more discussion.

“My own position is that there will have to be a discussion and agreement between the medical people and the family because I think that the family should have a say in the process of discontinuing the treatment that would mean the person would die,” he added.

Head of the Barbados Christian Council Monsignor Vincent Blackett was unable to comment as he said he was in the process of preparing to leave the island.

The QEH’s chief administrator came in for some criticism for his suggestion on social media.

James told those gathered for yesterday’s lecture at the Grande Salle of the Central Bank that sooner or later, consideration would have to be given to taking brain-dead patients off life support, as one means of reducing spiraling health care costs that were likely to make the provision of services unsustainable.

“That is an ethical dilemma that we have to address if we are really serious about fixing some of these systemic problems in the system,” he said, noting that there were cases where the QEH kept patients on life support even though all indicators pointed to them being brain-dead.

Posting on Barbados TODAY’s Facebook page, some readers agreed that it was an ethical dilemma and suggested that the decision had to involve family members.

“These are tough decisions that have no wrong or right answers. I suppose inevitably the answer will come down to one of economics,” Santini More wrote.

Tara Inniss-Gibbs contended that “lawmakers should consider how there could be provisions for advanced directives or living wills so that families can make these decisions with the advanced guidance of their loved ones”.

However, there were others who opposed any such discussion or move.

“Only God Almighty has to right to decide when it’s time for someone to die; no one else!” Deighton Mottley said.

David Elcock added: “Seems as though it’s not futility of care that is making this decision but rather one of economics. It is bad when we equate people’s’ lives to money and people lose. How did we get here?”

Robert Holloway questioned whether James had the figures “to prove that this low number of patients is causing such a debt to the Government”, while Sharon Woolley asked how a determination would be made on “who gets the chance of living life longer and who doesn’t”.

6 Responses to FORGET IT!

  1. Caswell Franklyn February 28, 2015 at 6:36 am

    When I heard the comments of Dr. James, my first reaction was that he was flying a kite for the Government because none of them had the guts. Pulling the plug on any patient must be done just to save cost. I remember in December 1995 a doctor at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital sat me down in his office and gave me the worst news that I have ever received. He said to me that I should take my mother home and make her comfortable for the last because there is nothing more that they could do for her. That was 19 years ago. Yesterday, my mother cooked lunch for me. So Dr. James and whoever sent you, let us err on the side of life.

  2. Caswell Franklyn February 28, 2015 at 6:39 am

    I intended to say that pulling the plug must NEVER be done to save cost.

  3. Olutoye Walrond February 28, 2015 at 8:12 am

    Although, Caswell, your mother’s case might not be a good example here, unless she was brain dead. Dr. James is talking about brain-dead patients on life support who never recover.

    It’s not an easy decision to make, but we have to ask the question: what is the point of keeping a person alive if all indications are that they will never return to normalcy.

  4. Caswell Franklyn February 28, 2015 at 8:44 am


    As usual you missed the point for sake of commenting but in doing so you have strengthened my point. My mother was not brain dead and they still gave up on her. My point is that the decision to pull the plug should never be about money: that is all I was trying to say.

  5. jr smith February 28, 2015 at 8:53 am

    You church people should stick to what you may or may not be good at, praying ,reading the bible and waiting for god.

  6. Shelly-Ann Walkes February 28, 2015 at 11:55 pm

    Great to see that the debate has begun about futility of care … We need national conversation on this most important topic. Barbados need laws that speak to advance directives.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *