News Feed

October 24, 2016 - Colombians arrested and charged Police have arrested and charged tw ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Man on firearm and ammo charge Police have arrested and charged 54 ... +++ October 24, 2016 - 62-year-old St Lucy resident missing Police are seeking the assistance o ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Today’s weather A tropical wave is affecting the is ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Police probe death at Golden Ridge, St George Police are investigating the sudden ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Possible funding for NGOs The Division of Economic Affairs ha ... +++


Former minister says cabinet and civil service too big

A former Democratic Labour Party (DLP) minister believes Prime Minister Freundel Stuart should cut the size of his Cabinet.

Sir Frederick Sleepy Smith insisted in an interview with Barbados TODAY that, the public sector was too large for a country of this size.

That, he said, included the number of Ministers.

“Barbados had no right with so many civil servants. It is complete foolishness . . . 20,000 civil servants is nonsense. A little two-by-three place like Barbados, why do you need so many civil servants?” he questioned, although insisting that it was “regrettable” that thousands of public servants were sent home earlier this year as Government implemented measures to cut costs and raise revenue.

Asked directly if he would recommend a Cabinet cut, Sir Frederick was quick to reply, “oh yes, tomorrow morning!”

“We could save on all those aspects,” he said.

He did not, however, identify any Ministers who he thought should get the axe.

Sir Frederick admitted that he was expecting to see a reduced Cabinet after the DLP won the February 21, 2013 general elections, taking 16 of the 30 seats in Parliament and securing a second consecutiveterm in office.

“But it didn’t happen and I can see now the reason why nothing can be done because you only have 14-16. So if two people who were dropped go over, you’re in trouble. So I can understand the political implications,” said the former Cabinet minister.

Addressing the wider issue of the public service, Sir Frederick charged that it was used as “an easy way for politicians to get jobs for their friends”.

He identified the National Conservation Commission (NCC), in particular, as one such agency.

“Everybody [who wants a job] goes to the NCC. You want a job, you go to the civil service. So, to that extent, both are padded,” he said.

He further contended that the NCC and the central Government were “resting places” for people sent by politicians.

“It is a resting place for politicians . . . from both sides, not only the Democratic Labour Party. The Barbados Labour Party has done the same thing over the years. For 14 years they were in power, they did the same thing; they have built up a civil service,” charged the DLP stalwart.

At the same time, the retired jurist said he was not happy with the way in which 200 retrenched NCC workers were being treated.

They have been awaiting a hearing before the Employment Rights Tribunal, to challenge their dismissals which took place in April this year.

However, no work has started and, in the meantime, the former employees have not received any severance.

“I hope that whatever they do that justice will prevail,” Sir Frederick said.

2 Responses to CUT THEM

  1. Maxine Baker November 29, 2014 at 2:47 pm

    Please forgive my ignorance in this matter. Those workers who are entitled to severance pay – were they all contracted on the same day? If not, would it not take time for the accountants to tally what is due to them for forwarding to the relevant department for payment? Would they not have to tabulate the uncertified “stay-at-home” days in order to arrive at an almost accurate sum to be paid to each worker? Did the NUPW representative inform the former workers of such a process and not make them “believe” that the process involved can be settled by the drop of a hat?

    Is the Union Rep. in possession of the individual amounts that should be paid to each worker instead of leaving them to “believe” – not “know”, that there will be differences in pay according to time of service and that it would not be fair to pay some of them and ask others to wait a while longer? Is this yet another matter to be used as a political scam in order to secure the next election? My.My, My – the lengths that some of us will go to boost our ego!!

  2. Colin Daniel November 30, 2014 at 3:03 pm

    What are the consequences for a senior civil servant or member of a statutory company who willfully hires more people than they have an approved appropriation in the budget to pay? If they believe the additional staff is justified, then they need to seek a supplementary to their budget prior to hiring the staff.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *