News Feed

October 23, 2016 - Barbados welcomes MV Viking Star The MV Viking Star docked for the f ... +++ October 23, 2016 - Griffith wins BLP nomination in St John   Charles Griffith will repres ... +++ October 23, 2016 - Hudson Griffith withdraws from BLP nomination for St John seat     As supporters of the ... +++ October 23, 2016 - Chelsea thrash Mourinho’s United 4-0 Source: AFP- LONDON, United Kingdom ... +++ October 23, 2016 - Relief on the way, says BWA The Barbados Water Authority (BWA) ... +++ October 23, 2016 - SSA board could face legal action, Comissiong warns Outspoken social activist and attor ... +++

Clear and present danger

While one might be able to pray or talk one’s way into paradise, it is highly unlikely that expressions of confidence and statements of intent alone from local authorities will prevent the Ebola virus from reaching Barbados’ shores.

We cannot do enough to prepare ourselves for the likelihood that Ebola reaches these shores. Our airport and seaport remain vulnerable and authorities must commit themselves to doing everything possible to upgrade their monitoring and preventative measures with respect to the disease. Logistically, our main hospital and polyclinics are ill-equipped and incapable of dealing with any major outbreak of Ebola. Our quarantine facilities have limited capacity and would be unable to accommodate significant numbers affected by the virus. Thus prevention appears highly more manageable for us than cure.

With all their sophistication and health protocols, not to mention their first-world status, countries such as the United States and Spain have already seen their first cases of Ebola. The Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Norway, England and France have also treated persons at home who brought the virus with them from West Africa. Some of these nations have expressed concerns about their capacity to deal with a major outbreak of the deadly threat. Therefore, prevention and limiting the possibility of the disease’s spread is their main focus.

Yesterday the World Health Organisation’s European director Zsuzsanna Jakab stated that the disease would inevitably spread through Europe, though the continent was well-prepared to deal with it.

“It is quite unavoidable … that such incidents will happen in the future because of the extensive travel both from Europe to the affected countries and the other way around,” she said.

Scientists who have been tracking the Ebola outbreak as well as airline traffic data have predicted a high risk of the disease being brought into Europe unwittingly in people traveling without knowing they are infected.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control which monitors disease in the European Union, indicated yesterday that while there was a small risk of travellers bringing Ebola into Europe without knowing it, the region’s public health authorities could effectively detect and confirm cases of the Ebola virus and work against its further spread.

Meanwhile in our neck of this global village, we are not satisfied that all is being done to ensure that Ebola does not enter Barbados. We are not comfortable with the level of preparedness to combat Ebola if it does reach. The effect such an eventuality would have on our social and economic stability would be devastating and we believe our response and preparations at this stage should reflect the absolute peril we would face, especially as a tourist destination.

We are not aware of what is happening at the constituency level, but nationally, the political directorate appears asleep at the wheel once again. We note that President of the United States Barack Obama and the British Prime Minister David Cameron have been particularly active in their intercourse with health officials in their respective countries with respect to the disease. While Minister of Health John Boyce and other health officials have publicly addressed the threat of Ebola, Prime Minister Freundel Stuart’s silence on the issue has led some to quip that he has already gone into quarantine.

But the threat of Ebola is one where there should be visible signs that measures are being put in place to deal with any eventuality. Are people in the workplace being sensitised about the disease and safety measures to be adopted? Have health officials been going into our schools? Have authorities embarked on any programmes to demonstrate the proper use of protective equipment in dealing with Ebola-affected persons? Has any consideration been given to demonstrating the proper handling and disposal of Ebola-affected corpses? Have there been any health drills carried out in the public and private sector under the guidance of the Ministry of Health specifically related to Ebola?

We note that there has been an attempt to educate the public via the electronic, broadcast and print media on the danger which Ebola poses. These must be sustained and enhanced and should become part of the daily diet of communications.

Those charged with manning our points of entry are critical to the preventative efforts and must be on a heightened sense of alert, especially as it relates to screening of individuals and their documentation. Tough as it might seem, this is the easier job in the equation.

If Ebola slips past their scrutiny, a much graver task awaits us all.

4 Responses to Clear and present danger

  1. Rawle Spooner
    Rawle Spooner October 15, 2014 at 10:29 pm

    Very good article and very true but is anyone listening wonder how many people in Barbados have any confidence in these people to seriously do any right when bigger richer countries reeling from it remember Barbados is a small fry on world stage..

  2. Tony Webster October 16, 2014 at 7:08 am

    A timely analysis-cum-reality check, madame editor. For sure, we better immediatley gather-up, and bring to bear, the very best available brains, both of the medical faculties, and especially, those with the knack of slicing-through bureaucratic tape, to even give us a chance of preventing the un-thinkable.
    The current review of the knee-jerk creation of the isolation thing at Enmore, and the possibility of the use of the far-better alternative at B.D.F, is a good sign, but this is yet far-removed from being our best-available, and total response.

    I suggest that we immediately recall Dr. Elizabeth Ferdinand from retirement, and also put similar medical folks (of all cadres) on stand-by for crash-course training and for actual duty at very , very short notice. This should include , those wonderfully adept and capable BDF men and women, who we have such faith in: they might not have imagined it this way…but there are surely now …”enemies at our gates”..and they quite likley, will be required to “fight them off”. Yes, suitably enhance emoluments for those coming out of retirement, and add equal measure for all public servants placed in danger’s way. With PAHO offices just down the road; and with a full complement of all of the major embassies all about us, we are well-placed to access help from our international friends -with-influence-and -capacity. Like, in the immediate acquisition of a full suite of PEP supplies and disinfection equipment. Yes, it’s gonna cost us, and we all know how much cash is left in de Treasury. However, because of the far-seeing vision of Dipper, in securing the C.D.B. Headquarters just up the hill from me…tell Chris to go have a cup of coffee quick-sharp with the bossman up there: tell William Warren, that Webby say, ease up some liquidity, and tek-out ‘e cheque-book. No joke. Do it today.

  3. Simon Williams October 19, 2014 at 6:14 am

    There is an experimental vaccine that seems to have proven effective vs Ebola strains not included in the vaccine makeup, in a trial with monkeys.

    Likely, it wont be long before there is a worldwide Ebola vaccine action.

    I guess it just depends on how comfortable the authorities are in respect of it being too early to state side effects.

    However, when it comes down to risk of contagion vs vaccination, likely vaccination will take priority.

    It just depends at what point enough vaccine is available and at what point the world governments decide the risk of not vaccinating has grown to unacceptable levels vs the unknown side effects of vaccinating.

  4. Patrick Blackman October 21, 2014 at 1:39 pm

    From 1976 to a few months ago there were less 1000 deaths from ebola worldwide, and now the whole world has gone crazy with hysteria over nothing. Remember the swine flu when president Forde was on TV being vaccinated and over 40 million people in the USA took the shots only to find out it was a hoax and only one person actually died from the flu but over 500 died from the vaccine.

    Why would any company invest in a vaccine when there is no market for it. It takes at least 12 years to bring a vaccine to market and all of a sudden we have all of the experimental vaccines around now….. Whats up with this…. may be we need to destroy the West African economy so they would allow the USA & EU to access the large oil reserves and minerals they found there within the last 2 years…. just saying


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *