News Feed

October 22, 2016 - Lashley urges innovation Minister of Culture, Youth and Spor ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Christmas Wonderland is back After a 12-year break, Simpson Moto ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Husbands wins St James South nomination Sandra Husbands has been elected th ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Burst main near Springer Memorial A crew from the Barbados Water Aut ... +++ October 22, 2016 - Helping Haiti The Help Haiti Today Radiothon, has ... +++ October 22, 2016 - St James man nursing stab wounds One woman is assisting police with ... +++

Mottley: Solid waste tax unfair

The Municipal Solid Waste Tax is simply a bad and unfair tax and the Government of Barbados must do right by its people.

Opposition Leader Mia Mottley levelled the charge today while addressing members of the Press on the impact the new tax on Barbadian society.

Speaking from the conference room of her offices in the Public Building, Mottley said: “Government must do right by the Barbados Association of Retired Persons. The Government must do right by the various private sector organisations that have spoken, from the BPSA [Barbados Private Sector Association] to the Chamber of Commerce to the hoteliers, who will feel it most because they have the largest investment capital in terms of real estate.

She also pointed out that people who live near to commercial operations and coastal areas “will pay a higher amount than people who live in the country.

Opposition Leader  Mia Mottley.

Opposition Leader Mia Mottley.

“These things cannot be right. All of us accept that the Government has a revenue problem, but you cannot get blood from stone. If the economic activity
is not taking place, you are not going to get people able to pay that which they do not have,” she added.

Mottley charged that the irony of the tax was that the majority of the commercial banks in Barbados whose profits were still there unlike other businesses, rent office space and therefore were not liable to pay the tax.

“Large land developers, people who buy 20, 30 40 acres of land, and may not have started the process of building on it, will not be asked to pay the tax,” she added.

“They have large capital bases and intend to build houses for people, but they do not have any buildings on the land as yet. They will not pay this tax.

She also pointed out that “town Houses will have low site values because they represent a density on a piece of land such that the value is in the building, but not the land. And the majority of people who live in Town Houses are middle to upper middle income,” she noted.

“I happen to know that in relation to some one set of town houses, where the values are $500,000 to $600,000 for the buildings, the Solid Waste Tax is $120 and $130, but an old lady living on 5,000, 7,000 square feet [of land] in St Michael or St James may well be paying $250, $300, two to three times what that person in that town house is paying. That cannot be right,” Mottley argued.

Mottley pointed that other governments around the world had repealed taxes, as she reiterated her call for the Government to do right by the people by repealing the Municipal Solid Waste Tax Act.


5 Responses to Mottley: Solid waste tax unfair

  1. Rommel Griffith
    Rommel Griffith July 10, 2014 at 11:02 pm

    They dont know that they caused more people to be laid off due to there tax

  2. Nicksie No Regrets Clarke
    Nicksie No Regrets Clarke July 10, 2014 at 11:10 pm

    i wonder if all these taxes Wiℓℓ be abolished when government changes

  3. Patrick Blackman July 11, 2014 at 9:51 am

    It is all well and good when you are a back seat driver Mia let see what you are going to do when you most probably regain the government. Bills have to be paid and therefore government has to raise taxes as horrible as it may be it has to be done. The problem is in the naming of the tax not the tax itself as the tax is very small 0.3%. The impact is large because the property values are extremely inflated and therefore a structural adjustment is required to bring this back in line. Many people made substantial amounts of money by selling their properties at these over valued prices but now are complaining about this small tax.

    What the alarmist are doing is concentrating on the name “Waste Tax” to stir emotions, the real issue here is that it a a property tax to tap into the substantial profits being made on property sales due over valuation and thats all. You cannot get it both ways, if you like the valuation of your property then you have to pay the taxes its as simple as that. Don’t be guided by these silly politicians do the math for your self.

  4. James Franks July 11, 2014 at 10:40 am

    Very bad tax, Freundal,you should know better.
    James Franks says Freundal? No Thanks!!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *