News Feed

October 20, 2016 - UPDATE: Yearwood gets bail Kwame Everton Dashawn Yearwood, 17, ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Wanted man surrenders Police  now have in custody 42-yea ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Teen charged in connection with ‘sex tape’ Police have arrested and formally c ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Teen’s living arrangements worry magistrate Information from a 17-year-old male ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Young cricketers show their mettle Reveria Cottle struck a well-played ... +++ October 20, 2016 - Look to organic farming – UNDP official A senior official of the United Nat ... +++

Garbage talk

Solid waste tax relief not that straight forward, says Sinckler

Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler has responded to widespread public calls for refunds or waivers of the controversial Municipal Solid Waste Tax on the site value of properties that generate waste in Barbados saying Government had no intention of reviewing the tax at this stage.

He also said calls by former Prime Minister Owen Arthur for relief on behalf of his constituents in St Peter, which have been echoed by other Barbados Labour Party MPs, was not as straight forward as they may seem.

Sinckler explained that for individuals to be considered for refunds or remittances, they must be paying the tax in the first place.

He said that Arthur was misleading the people and he warned that persons waiting for relief in such circumstances and missed their deadline to pay, would suffer penalties.

He however acknowledged that under Section 5 of the Municipal Solid Waste Tax Act, the Minister of Finance could grant reprieve.

“If the minister is satisfied on grounds of undue hardship or for any other reason that it would be just and equitable to do so, he may remit or refund the whole or any part of the tax imposed under this Act, including any penalties thereon, payable or paid by any person,” the law states.

However, the Minister of Finance pointed out that the law did not make provision for waivers of the tax, amidst pleas from the Dairy and Beef Producers Association for its members to be exempted.

Sinckler also responded to threats by some persons to take him to court to get relief from the tax.

“The legislation is clear. It says that the minister may, it didn’t say I shall [give relief]. The court can’t make its own law and say I have to give [somebody] relief, because it’s may. It’s just a circus they are trying to create. I analyse, and do an analysis  . . . and then I make a decision, based on what the advice is [coming] from the technical people,” he insisted.

Commenting on reports that the Opposition was preparing to send letters to him on the matter, the Minister of Finance said: “If they are all over the place giving the impression that if they write a letter to me that I have to automatically do it [that is not the case].

“. . . they have to show the hardship, you pay and then you ask for it,” he said.

He suggested that there was another story behind the solid waste tax.

“People have to know that it is because of the failing of the last administration that we are in the position that we are in now. But we have to do this [impose the tax]. It’s either you’re going to tax it on land, or put it on food. Either way it has to be done.

“And if you do it on imported stuff, it can’t be on imported stuff only, it has to be done on all production in Barbados,” declared Sinckler.

He blamed then prime minister Arthur for imposing an environmental levy which he said the current government was forced to remove because of challenges faced with CARICOM and the World Trade Organisation.

He warned:“If we do it that way again, straight to the CCJ [Caribbean Court of Justice], and the CCJ rightfully will say, ‘it is a tax against CARICOM imports into Barbados, remove it’.”

Sinckler argued strongly in defence of the tax was on land saying “if you have to pay [businessman] Bizzy Williams $30 million to treat garbage to reduce the volume of the garbage going to the Belle . . . there is nothing else.

“They ain’t no other landfill in Barbados. So if you don’t do waste to energy, and if you don’t extend the life, as it is, of the current cell, we have to take [millions of dollars] to get done. If we don’t do that, Barbados will have a problem where we have no place to put garbage,” he stressed.

Sinckler said everybody want their garbage collected, but many do not know that it is a nightmare now for the Sanitation Service Authority.

He said Barbados was now $70 million out as a result of Greenland, adding that “Mount Stinkeroo”  was extended to its final cell that cost more than $30 million.

“That’s $100 million that we spent already and then you have turn around now and pay $30 million a year to treat the garbage to reduce the volume so you can extend the life of the landfill, and nobody wants to pay for it,” he said.


9 Responses to Garbage talk

  1. Matthew Furby Dan Spooner
    Matthew Furby Dan Spooner July 5, 2014 at 12:06 am


  2. Sherry Gittens
    Sherry Gittens July 5, 2014 at 1:12 am

    Enjoy your last years in government cause wanna ain’t getting in again

  3. Francis McClean
    Francis McClean July 5, 2014 at 5:15 am

    In one of the worst economic time Bdos has ever had why this government taxing the poor people into submission. Do they understand economics????sentiment coupled with confidence is the oxygen in a struggling economy. Trust is the outcome. They have manage to extinguish all. Please tell me how they expect to stimulate the economy when they are making the people feel hopeless about everything. Please use Wunna common sense man. Fuhget book learn.

  4. Philip Matthews July 5, 2014 at 10:23 pm

    The minister of finance and all the DLP MPs seem to forget that poor people can’t afford just to pay any bill just so , and why is it so much on just landowners and none whatsoever on renters , this should be a monthly bill just like a water or a light bill , most people will be taking the Land tax money to pay this now , and paying late on the land tax , all because it will take months to save .
    The economy will suffer worst , no extra money to spend for 4 months .

  5. Daniel July 6, 2014 at 8:02 am

    Its sad that after all these years of this admistration being in power and spending money left right and center including N.I.S monies on new projects that dont concern them .example “Three years refurbishing Sherbourne Conference Center ” that they still see it fit to complain about the previous the administration (BLP) that brought way more money than they continue to dream and lie of delivering, Caricom, 20/20 Cricket and the list go on and bajans hardly had to be over taxed because BLP know how to do proper trade with foreign countries. DLP stop blaming and find solutions other than Taxing Bajans who seem to be majority unemployed anyway. Crush the Nations People you will disturb everything else including Tourism because brek people will do anything to get money including armed robberies like we are witnessing all now. Its about time you guys stop being immature and selfish cause the majority of Barbadians pay arent anywhere near your salaries which is being paid by the same Bajans you are over taxing.

  6. Jackie Alleyne July 6, 2014 at 8:34 am

    Obviously, Sinckler does not understand “hardship”. How do people who do not HAVE THE MONEY to pay, pay money that they do not have?

  7. Jackie Alleyne July 6, 2014 at 8:35 am

    Sinckler does not understand “hardship”. How do people who do not HAVE THE MONEY to pay, pay money that they do not have?

  8. Jackie Alleyne July 6, 2014 at 8:51 am

    There appears to be a misconception that because you own a property that you have money. Who cares about whether home owners can maintain their properties or not – it seems this is NOT taken into consideration. Home owners already are burdened with land tax which has, in some cases, doubled in the past couple of years. A tax for garbage should include everyone who generates garbage.

  9. Cinderella July 6, 2014 at 12:51 pm

    This goverment just shows they are true to form. Lies lies and more lies. Stop the blame game. They came into goverment and were spending left right and centre. Yet we voted them back in. how could stop the people”s spending and expect an economy to grow. It has a spiraling effect. This goverment for the birds. Sorry, I just can’t back them.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *