News Feed

October 26, 2016 - Government has run out of options – Arthur Government’s fiscal policy is inf ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Sick airline A top official of regional airline ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Teachers back away from court threat The Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Beacon supports regulatory move Beacon Insurance Company is giving ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Challenge series returns Sunday Suzuki Challenge Series (SCS) point ... +++ October 26, 2016 - Waste to energy still alive – Lowe The Cahill project might be a thing ... +++

Rethink our farming ways

speaking out

With all the recent and current talk on agriculture and our gargantuan food import bill, a serious rethink on how we acquire our food is urgently required. With our food import bill around $800 million to $900 million a year, we cannot afford not to.

When we look at agriculture as it’s now practised, we recognize that sugar cane cultivation accounts for most of our agriculture land. A quick look at sugar production reveals that the yield as measured in weight per square foot per year is only 0.15lb/sq.ft/yr. By contrast food production, using methods currently practised elsewhere (some of these places here in the Caribbean) can yield from 1.0 up to 5.0 (and beyond) lb/sq.ft/yr.

It has been argued that we need to continue sugar production for a number of reasons. Following are the arguments against these so-called reasons:

Sugar brings in valuable foreign exchange. The foreign exchange from sugar cane is at most $80 million net per year (counting all the by-products including rum). However, by developing a rational food production system we could reduce our food import bill by at least 30 per cent in five years. This amounts to $240 million to $270 million of foreign exchange saved per year.

Cultivation of sugar cane prevents soil erosion. There are many other (and better) ways to prevent soil erosion. Some of these include permaculture, contour tilling and planting, no-dig agriculture, water harvesting. Sugar cane can be grown for production of fuel. The argument is this is done in other places and can be done here too. It has been found that this takes land for food out of production and leads to increased food costs. Also, Brazil is often used as an example of energy from sugar cane.

However, Brazil has a surface area of 3.288 million square miles and a population density of 60.43 persons per square mile, while Barbados has a surface area of 166 square miles and a population density of 1,710 persons per square mile.

We need to take the position that Lee Kwan Yew of Singapore took many, many years ago; that is, Singapore’s land was too valuable to be squandered producing cash crops for export. We can put our valuable agricultural land to far better use.

We can produce food on the very smallest of plots anywhere in the country using innovative methods for which there is extensive instruction available (there is a individual with a 640 square-foot plot with 32 different fruit trees). These methods include permaculture, urban gardening, bio-intensive gardening, vertical gardening, and so on.

Its about time we start thinking seriously about agriculture, start recognizing the link between agriculture, nutrition and health and stop bemoaning the fact that our food import bill is astronomical and we spend exorbitant sums on chronic non-communicable disease. Producing significantly more nutritious food could go a long way in addressing both of these concerns.

By the way, the International Food Policy Research Institute has produced a document titled Reshaping Agriculture For Nutrition and Health.




5 Responses to Rethink our farming ways

  1. Princess Tiny Neferua
    Princess Tiny Neferua April 12, 2014 at 9:23 pm

    this old story again…I guess it’s cheaper to bring in inferior food and sell us..than to purchase local….I which someone could tell me what our import bill was 30 yrs ago and the different it is now…and how much healthier were the folks 30 yrs ago than they are now…

  2. Charly Bamboo
    Charly Bamboo April 13, 2014 at 2:18 am

    Yes organic is the way to go, stop importing that rubbish from america.

  3. Angel OfThunder
    Angel OfThunder April 13, 2014 at 3:24 am

    Yes only way in to our future…

  4. Veroniva Boyce
    Veroniva Boyce April 13, 2014 at 5:53 am

    There is nothing wrong with living off the land. It is hard work the beauty of it, is seeing what has been produced and the satisfaction that you can feed your family.

  5. Tony Webster April 13, 2014 at 6:33 am

    Hi Mde. Editor; sorry the typo..please correct to TONY Webster, lest some innocent Tiny guy gets the blame for my effort!! Thanks.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *