News Feed

October 28, 2016 - Case dismissed The case brought by the Ministry of ... +++ October 28, 2016 - Employees pampered As Education Month draws to a close ... +++ October 28, 2016 - ‘Take big view of agriculture’ GEORGE TOWN, Cayman Islands– Sta ... +++ October 28, 2016 - NUPW reacts to Lowe’s comments on privatization The island’s largest public secto ... +++ October 28, 2016 - BUT warns of new militant approach The Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT ... +++ October 28, 2016 - Cameron expresses confidence in Windies women KINGSTON, Jamaica – West Indi ... +++

Up in the air

NUPW and public service commission to meet again on revenue workers

With the April 1 deadline fast approaching for sign-on to a new super agency, the fate of more than 400 workers at Government revenue collection agencies remains up in the air.

Today, the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) and the Barbados Public Service Commission held their latest round of talks and are scheduled to meet again on the future of workers who will not be part of the soon to be formed Barbados Revenue Authority (BRA).

Following the meeting at the union’s Dalkeith headquarters with members from Customs & Excise, Inland Revenue, Licensing Authority, VAT Office, and Land Tax Departments, NUPW general secretary Dennis Clarke said there were only 300 positions to be filled at the BRA.

“You have more employees than you have posts in BRA. Somewhere along the line, this is where we are going to have to get to Service Commission and [have] discussions with them over how they will place those who didn’t want go to BRA and those who will not be able to go to BRA because [there are] more persons than you have positions,” he said.

Clarke also revealed that talks were held last Friday with Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs, Chris Sinckler and his permanent secretaries.

“That meeting was to look at an offensive portion in a letter of expression of interest which we wanted withdrawn and that was done. We wanted to know how many people would not be offered a letter of expression of interest and we were told seven. We were able to get that figure adjusted.

“This evening, we [also] looked at those persons . . . there are some who should have been appointed under the 2007 Public Service Act. We have to get that straightened out and make sure that they get appointed before there is any transition. Then there is a salary that is attached to each post and the workers are concerned about those salary-ranges because they wanted to see the incremental scale [and how it] fitted in to their salaries,” Clarke added, noting that in case of activities at the Port, an area to be looked at pertained to the collection of cash at the site,” the union official added.

Earlier this month, the battle lines were drawn when workers were given the April 1 deadline to sign on to the new revenue authority. Many of the employees had received letters indicating that they would receive a reduced salary, a move which Clarke had condemned.

2 Responses to Up in the air

  1. Tony Webster March 26, 2014 at 5:37 am

    There are no “battle-lines” drawn! Since yesterday’s clarification of what we had all suspected, like the true source of the re-ordering of our Public Service, the better way to describe the ‘conflict’ might be to cast one eyes into Ukraine…where their new government’s engagement with Putin’s forces…was an “orderly surrender”. Not a shot was fired; only muted mumblings were politely laid at the feet of their Invading Menacing Forces.
    Welcome to Crimea.
    We all better learn ‘cyrillic’ fast…and read further comminiques from you-know-who…very, very carefully.
    We also might accord “due weight” to any more pronouncements originating from Church Village.

  2. Ms. Bemused March 27, 2014 at 12:08 am

    Just wondering, how is Mighty Mr. Clarke going to ask/petition Government to appoint persons to posts under the 2007 Act when he did nothing for hundreds of persons that would’ve also been entitled under the same Act. that was recently made redundant. Special interest as usual Mighty Mr. Clarke/Mr. Duty Free??? And, why are you all of a sudden calling for prompt enactment of sexual harrassment legislation when recently a major case of such was brought to you to fight on behalf of one of your members and all you did was to hide behind your desk SIR??? No action at all on behalf of that worker not even a phone call, but telling that lady to be careful because the accused can take her to court for slander. Special interest as usual. Dr. Belle is so spot on. I think its time you relieve yourself of your position SIR let someone that is actually interested in representing the workers of Barbados have that seat. Good riddance.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *