News Feed

October 25, 2016 - Vehicle overturns at Warrens Police say no injuries were reporte ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Digital direction Send and receive money digitally, e ... +++ October 25, 2016 - GG winding down school visits In a matter of weeks, once all goes ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Husbands, Walcott brilliant in Canada TORONTO, Canada – Veteran Bar ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Many positives on Windies A tour DAMBULLA, Sri Lanka – Head co ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Dismissal of iMart cashier raises eyebrows The Labour Department is said to be ... +++

Sore Payne

by Roy R. Morris

George Payne

George Payne

Bees are not only stinging Dems these days.

According to court documents obtained by Barbados TODAY, veteran Member of Parliament George Payne was so hurt by comments allegedly made by party colleague, Edmund Hinkson, a parliamentary new-comer, after the February 21 General Elections that he is now suing him for defamation.

The claim form, filed in the Supreme Court by the law firm Smith & Smith on April 25, on Payne’s behalf, seeks “damages for defamation in respect of the words published and spoken of the Claimant by the Defendant on the 25th day of February 2013 at a meeting held at the Barbados Labour Party Headquarters Roebuck Street Bridgetown which was attended by thirteen (13) members of the Barbados Labour Party elected to the Parliament of Barbados in the parliamentary elections held on the 21st day of February, 2013”.

Among other things, Payne also wants the court to grant an injunction restraining Hinkson or his servants or agents from repeating the words of which he complained.

In the official court document, Payne’s attorneys stated:

“A meeting of the newly elected members of the Barbados Labour Party in Parliament was held on Monday 25th February 2013 at the Barbados Labour Party Headquarters, Roebuck Street, Bridgetown, St. Michael at 10:30 a.m. The main purpose of the meeting was to select the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament.

“The persons who attended the meeting were Mia Amour Mottley, Cynthia Forde, Santia Bradshaw, Dale Marshall, Maria Agard, Ronald Toppin, Dwight Sutherland, Glyne Clarke, Trevor Prescod, Kerry Simmons, Jeffrey Bostic, Edmund Hinkson and the Claimant. The meeting was chaired by Mr. Dale Marshall.

Edmund Hinckson

Edmund Hinckson

“During the meeting, there were a number of contributions and interruptions and Mr. Edmund G. Hinkson was requested on more than one occasion to allow other members to make their representation without interruption. While the Claimant was making his contribution to the meeting, he was suddenly interrupted by the Defendant who indicated that he had no moral authority to speak about leadership and shouted out in a loud voice:

“You are a crook and a criminal; you are a big Queen’s Counsel and you committed fraud; you are totally unfit to be a member of parliament; you aint got any right here; you should be in prison”.

“The Chairman tried to calm him down and Mr. Ronald Toppin chided him for his outburst but in response to Mr. Toppin he retorted: “Don’t mind you, what do you have to show for the eighteen (18) years you were a Member of Parliament?”.

Other members spoke to him about his behaviour including Mr. Dwight Sutherland, one of our newest members who indicated to him that he should apologise for his outburst, which was disrespectful to a senior member and was sending the wrong message to the new members. To this he responded: “There are no senior members in here, we are all equal. George Payne is a political clown.”

“The Claimant felt humiliated, depressed and embarrassed by the comments made inasmuch as these statements were totally untruthful and because he had never had such damaging accusations made against him nor was he privy to any conduct on his part which would warrant such a damaging assessment of his character.

“It was the first time that the claimant had ever heard any person making any negative comments about him with criminal implications since his admission to the Bar in 1975 as an attorney-at-law or since his election to the House of Assembly in 1991 as a Member of Parliament. Furthermore, the Claimant has never in his lifetime been involved or implicated in any matter which would warrant such accusations.

“Since the Defendant made those accusations the Claimant has had many sleepless nights reflecting on the comments made by the Defendant with whom the Claimant has had very little dealing or contact in his political and professional life and can find no plausible or logical reason for these baseless attacks on him.”

The court document further states:

1. The words “you are a crook and a criminal; you are a big Queen’s Counsel and you committed fraud; you are totally unfit to be a member of parliament; you aint got any right here; you should be in prison”, are unfounded false and defamatory and in their natural and ordinary meaning mean and are understood to mean that:

(a) the claimant is dishonest and has been convicted of a criminal offence;

(b) that the claimant has committed fraud;

2. By innuendo, the words mean and are understood to mean that as a Queen’s Counsel, he should be disbarred from practising law because of having committed fraud.

(a) that the Claimant is unsuitable and unfit to be a member of parliament and should be disqualified from being a member of Parliament.

(b) that the Claimant should be convicted and imprisoned for criminal offences committed.

In consequence, the Claimant’s personal and professional business, political and civic reputation has been seriously damaged and the Claimant has suffered considerable mental pain, distress and embarrassment.

(d) the said words complained of were calculated and intended to disparage the Claimant in his said profession, his civic duties and personal business and character and in fact have done so.”

Under the heading “malice” it added:

(1) The Defendant has maliciously published and spoken the defamatory statements of the Claimant.

(2) The Defendant has acted with spite and ill-will towards the Claimant.

(3) The Defendant has published and spoken the defamatory statements of the Claimant in utter and reckless disregard that the statements are unfounded and untrue.

(4) The statements were totally unnecessary and irrelevant to the business and issues of the meeting.

(5) The Claimant states that as a result of the defamatory publication in use in this action he has been brought into ridicule scandal and contempt both personally and in his profession and public and civic roles.

(6) The Defendant’s conduct towards the Claimant has been malicious reckless, callous, reprehensible and in complete and total disregard for his personal and professional and political reputation.

(7) Notice of the defamation has been served on the Defendant requesting an apology but the Defendant has not offered a suitable and satisfactory apology and amends nor has he given the requested written assurance and undertaking that he will not further or at any time in the future make the said statements or any statement of similar imputations concerning the Claimant.”

16 Responses to Sore Payne

  1. Adrian Hinds May 3, 2013 at 10:05 pm

    When the photos of the BLP meeting to pick the Leader of the opposition were published, the faces of all told the tale that is now being made public. Indeed a picture is worth a thousand words.

  2. SHOES May 4, 2013 at 8:25 am


  3. Frank Husbands May 4, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    If I did get on so they would say “..don’t mind he he ain’t nobody.” Now these suppose to be somebody and look how they getting on.

  4. Clyde May 4, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    I kind of liked Mr. Hinckson during the elections,I didn’t care too much for Mr.Payne after his previous doings BUT.
    Mr Hinckson,you must realize that all Bajan politicians stick together.
    You were wrong,and you will loose.
    Remember,”A slip of a lip will sink a ship”

  5. mickey May 5, 2013 at 2:17 pm

    Payne is so unlucky.He got fired for allegedly using government stationery to write to the leader of the opposition (David Thompson) He suffered with parliamentary laryngitis for nearly 10 years ,and now he has seemingly recovered he is being called a “crook and a criminal”.All this after the ministry he was in charge of handed Al Barrack a contract (without a even the slightest hint of scandal mind you)to build that building in warrens .Gosh, I wanted to say so much more but my tongue is starting to hurt my cheek.

  6. justic marcus May 6, 2013 at 4:41 pm

    its about time someone say something in america he would have been charged and locked aways, good for hinkson, hope the people rally around him.

  7. anton May 7, 2013 at 4:11 am

    nothing new…

  8. lynda May 7, 2013 at 6:57 am

    im wondering why they continue to air their dirty laundry in public..?five years is around the corner and electorates will remember these filt…i wish them both good luck in politics because they will need it

  9. Ashley May 7, 2013 at 8:55 am

    so why wunna cussing payne?? Hinkson was wrong….that is the man reputation, everything isnt political. If i was Payne i would tell wunna to kiss my 8%@. he right to sue hinkson

  10. Watcher May 7, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    Payne by name and nature (pun intended) he aint only trying to make hinkson look bad but he hurting his own party, damn fool, he should have just cuss back Hinkson and walk away…..if you cant talk heat , keep out of the kitchen lol

  11. Dorothy May 8, 2013 at 2:48 am

    I am surprised that some people cannot understand the stress that malicious lies and innuendoes can cause. The verbal outburst that Mr.Hinckston directed toward Mr. Payne is despicable. Hinckson was at a gathering with his peers and his spontaneous outburst showed, disrespect for them and as a new member of parliament, a lack of judgement and accountability in himself. Shame on you Hinckson.

  12. Garvin May 8, 2013 at 5:59 am

    Payne in particular and Hinckson would fail any objective test to be MP’s unfortunately elections dont work that way. They should be ejected from the House.

  13. Nigel May 9, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    I don’t know about the rest of that stuff, but one thing I Know Edmund Hinkson got right is that “George Payne is a political clown”

  14. gaynelle May 13, 2013 at 4:39 pm

    Edmund Hinkson you are incorrect. However what surprises me is that not Owen or even Mia who is soo hungry to lead has sat these two down, spoken to Hinkson and told him for the party’s sake he needs to be respectful, make a public apology and respect a man who has proven to be an asset to the pary for 10 years. Clown of not , he could learn from his experiences because we can see he is a one hit wonder. he is disrespectful. Mia should issue him with a written warning for disrespect to a stalwart and George should withdraw the lawsuit. Focus on the party. don’t get thin skinned. we true BLP members still love you all.

  15. bajanfishermen May 15, 2013 at 10:17 am

    Mr. Hinkson, has always been a narcissist. Some people believe that they are entitled to a politcal position, at any cost. This is a result of the a very nasty situation that is being played out in St. James North. When you make such statements about a person’s character, you must prove it. If such fail, then you must be made t pay a very hefty cost, so as to deter others from such behavior.

    One previous politician did such to our Late Prime Minister, Tom Adams. Mr. Adams, made him pay dearly through this said court system.
    Now Mr. Hinkson, your narcissism will cost you dearly.

  16. Anna Payette May 28, 2013 at 2:52 pm

    Mr. Hinckson is wrong in accusing Mr. Payne of being a “crook and dishonest”; without any hard facts to back that up, he should be made to pay for making such accusations. I am glad that Mr. Payne, if he has nothing to hide, is going after the big mouth …. in order to make him pay for the damage that he is doing to his reputation.

    If Mr. Hinkson cannot prove these accusations, in a court of law, then he should be made to pay for voicing them. If it turns out then that they are false, then Mr. H. will have to learn that you can’t besmirch a person’s name, without there being any consequences, and as a result, he would know to be sure of his facts before making accusations. As the saying goes “Give a dog a bad name and hang him.” One can’t just go around bad mouthing and falsely accusing others and then getting away with it.

    If Mr. Hinkson has any proof as to these accusations, let him produce them in a court of law, otherwise, Mr. Payne has the riight to sue the “pants, underwear and socks” off him for having his reputation tarnished in such a public manner. All I can say is, in this case let justice prevail.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *