News Feed

October 21, 2016 - Warrens win thriller over Dover Warrens Sports Club Seniors registe ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Neymar staying at Barcelona Barcelona today confirmed that Neym ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Tudor hospitalized Former Cabinet Minister and Member ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Three chasing racing honours Tensions are high with just under a ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Meakins fifth best in the world Former Barbados squash champion Kar ... +++ October 21, 2016 - Missing after Matthew On Saturday October 22, Barbados ... +++

A new house

barbadosparliamentUnless the Democratic Labour Party is able to spring some “surprises”, the Freundel Stuart Administration is likely to be voted out of office in Thursday’s general election.

After conducting its second public opinion poll in as many weeks between last Friday and today, CADRES is predicting the DLP stands to lose as many of the 11 seats it held in Parliament to Owen Arthur’s Barbados Labour Party, and in doing so also lose the Government.

And while this latest survey found that Arthur has moved back ahead of Stuart in the preferred leadership stakes, the two are in a statistical “dead heat”.

CADRES is also now predicting a seven per cent swing toward to BLP and a six per cent swing away from the DLP, with the one per cent difference suggesting that “the independent candidates can cumulatively expect to receive one per cent of the national vote, which would directly impact on the DLP’s support base”.

Using key characteristics, namely historic support level, candidate performance in the previous election, change of candidate (incumbent or challenger) prevailing national support for party and party swing, contemporary support (poll data), CADRES has the BLP in poll position.

Pollster Peter Wickham said the BLP candidates “highly likely” to be victorious, based on the data, were Arthur (St. Peter), Mia Mottley (St. Michael North East), Cynthia Forde (St. Thomas), Dr. Maria Agard (Christ Church West), Gline Clarke (St. George North), Edmund Hinkson (St. James North), and Ronald Toppin (St. Michael North).

Additionally, the Bees “likely” to get the nod from voters were Dale Marshall (St. Joseph), George Payne (St. Andrew), Santia Bradshaw (St. Michael South East), Ian Gooding-Edghill (St. Michael West Central), Anthony Wood (St. Philip South), George Hutson (St. James Central).

In the case of the DLP, CADRES found it was “highly likely” that Mara Thompson (St. John), Michael Lashley (St. Philip North), Denis Kellman (St. Lucy), Stuart (St. Michael South), Stephen Lashley (Christ Church West Central), and Ronald Jones (Christ Church East Central), would be Members of Parliament after the election.

They were “likely” to be joined by Dr. David Estwick (St. Philip West), Dr. Esther Byer-Suckoo (St. George South), Donville Inniss (St. James South) and Chris Sinckler (St. Michael North West).

Based on the above predictions, this would mean that the BLP would win 17 seats and the DLP 10, leaving an additional three marginal seats to be decided.

Using the historic, candidate, national party support and other data, however, CADRES concluded that the BLP’s Wilfred Abrahams (Christ Church East), David Gill (St. Michael South Central), and Arthur Holder (St. Michael Central) were the “possible” winners.

The best case scenario therefore meant a 20 to 10 victory for the BLP.

In what is a significant bit of good news for the BLP, this latest public opinion poll found that party appeared to have widened its lead over the DLP.

Despite predicting a clear victor for the current opposition party, Wickham said it was clear that “this will be one of the most marginal and indeed competitive campaigns ever endured in this nation’s history”.

“This marginality is evidenced by the fact that a shift of four per cent to five per cent in support over the last week has resulted in a presumptive loss of five more seats for the DLP,” the pollster said in his analysis of the polling data.

“CADRES has repeatedly made the point that this DLP Government appears strong in terms of numbers but is in reality comparatively weaker than any other first term government that the DLP has had previously.

“As such the slightest deterioration in support will have a devastating impact on seats. It is against this background that CADRES has argued that the party better organised on election day in all of the marginal constituencies has what would be called a better ‘fighting chance’ to win those ‘seats’,” he added.

Wickham also said notwithstanding the possibility of DLP “surprises” in some instances, “CADRES is at this time of the opinion that the BLP will win the 2013 election on Thursday with between 17 and 20 seats, while we believe that the DLP will occupy the Opposition benches with between 10 and 13 seats”.

CADRES has concluded that this latest public opinion survey is a more accurate measurement of the current mood of the Barbadian electorate, coming as it is after the launch of the BLP and DLP manifestos and in essence capturing “a fully evolved election campaign”.

“As such this poll in our opinion presents a far better podium from which we can assess the likely outcome of the 2013 general election. Interestingly enough the only noteworthy consideration would be the controversy created by the publication of the first poll and the significantly reduced swing against the DLP which was reported,” it said.

The survey also found that the BLP was the greater beneficiary of the past week’s campaign, with its support moving from “a statistically significant” 34 per cent to 42 per cent, while the DLP’s support moved from 32 per cent to 34 per cent.

This, the CADRES data determined, meant that DLP support “has remained fundamentally unchanged in the last week, while the BLP has been able to grow its support among the ‘Uncertain Voters'”.

Also more in the BLP’s favour following the survey was the leadership preference and calculated electoral swing.

In the space of a week Arthur has moved back to the top of the list with 37 per cent (from 33 per cent) while Stuart has declined from 36 per cent to 32 per cent, but the changes were considered “statistically insignificant”.

9 Responses to A new house

  1. lisa peters February 19, 2013 at 11:07 am

    thisi is untrue data peter and cadres in denial state the dems will win 2013elections

  2. Kay-rani rosita February 19, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    If they make the mistake of voting the BLP back into power, they deserve the government they will get. Just wait until the honeymoon period is over…heaven help us all!

  3. Clyde Layne February 19, 2013 at 1:39 pm

    Bajans make a lot of noise at election time.
    Two weeks into the new government,all is back to normal.
    Believe me, all bajan governments put Barbados first.
    I consider myself a BLP but for the last five years,the DLP was my government.
    For the next five I will have a BLP government,so it goes.

  4. shai February 19, 2013 at 1:41 pm


  5. lynda February 19, 2013 at 8:10 pm

    at the end of the day, we have to work, and work hard, despite which Party wins.i find so much hatred, quarrels and bad blood between us the electorates…….dis agreeing over frundel and owen who dont even know us!!!!!

  6. Kay-rani rosita February 19, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    Do not be so fast Shai, you need to ask yourself who are behind the private finances, and what do they want in exchange, what will Barbadians have to give up. You can bet it will not be a fair trade.

  7. David February 20, 2013 at 12:33 pm

    Is George Hutson a “Bee”?

  8. Chris February 20, 2013 at 3:51 pm

    Everyone arguing against these poll results. What people dont seem to get is that there is no fundamental difference in the results of the poll published Sunday and the one that came out Monday night. Both predicted a BLP win and thats the most important thing. Frundel Stuart’s popularity remained the same but Owens went up as undecided voters decided. When has Peter Wickham been wrong? Name one time! At the end of the day by tomorrow night we will likely have a new government.

  9. petersl February 20, 2013 at 9:39 pm

    l hate it when the public and politicians attack pollsters. peter wickham is a professional who makes a living from being able to predict polls. when i hear him speak he appears to be generally fair? He will make more money from being able to calll a poll correctly than from skewing one, believe me . Continue the good work peter


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *