News Feed

October 25, 2016 - Dead wrong! Minister of Education Ronald Jones ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Sinckler urges retailers to follow the rules Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler ... +++ October 25, 2016 - Uphill task ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates  ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Mock money Stripteasers at some adult entertai ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Bra on Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler ... +++ October 24, 2016 - Tudor on the mend Former Democratic Labour Party (DLP ... +++

Shakira sued for $100 million

Shakira and ex-boyfriend Antonio de la Rua

Colombian pop superstar Shakira is being sued for $100 million by ex-boyfriend Antonio de la Rua, who claims he acted as her business manager for years.

He claims he was the “principal architect” of a business plan that turned her into an icon and seeks to “recover his share of past and future partnership profits”.

In a separate case, Shakira is suing de la Rua for misappropriation of funds.

Her legal case, filed in the Bahamas in October, accuses him of paying himself an unauthorised bonus and using funds from their business for personal expenses.

Antonio de la Rua has denied the allegations. His legal papers, however, provide a rare insight into the intricacies of sustaining a global pop career such as Shakira’s.

He explains how the couple met in 2000, shortly after he had managed his father Fernando’s successful campaign to become president of Argentina.

As they became romantically involved, he frequently joined Shakira on her first world tour — The Tour Of The Mongoose — where she came to a surprise revelation.

He describes how the now-35-year-old and pregnant Shakira (the father is Gerard Pique) was “shocked” to learn the tour had “actually lost money”.

The news caused the singer “extreme emotional distress and interfered with her ability to sleep and perform”. She sacked her manager, and asked Antonio de la Rua to step in.

They agreed he would be entitled to a share of the profits from her career “in exchange for the contribution of his business and marketing skills, knowledge and expertise”.

His court papers acknowledge that the partnership, which began in 2004, was based only on an “oral agreement”. However, he claims he’s entitled to the money because:

* He brokered a $300 million deal for her with concert promoters Live Nation.

* He signed a “lucrative” deal for a range of perfumes featuring the star.

* He was instrumental in persuading a reluctant Shakira to record the song Hips Don’t Lie in order to reverse flagging sales of her Oral Fixation Vol. 2 album.

* He brokered a deal for Shakira to record the World Cup song Waka Waka, which ensured a profitable world tour and “saved the relationship” with Live Nation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *